Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

new Win2K driver losses sharpness, edge clarity

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I've used the exact same monitor configs in both cases, for me there was a definite reduction in sharpness and contrast of the image. I'm going to have another play with the new drivers and see if it reoccurs.

    Comment


    • #17
      For those who posted "HUh? ah? no way? I don't see that? etc" should be ashame of yourself. Now ANT is the most fair and honest murcer here.

      By posting incorrect and bias comments here, not only mislead other matrox user, also prove how inmature you are. jmo.

      Bravo ant, hats off!

      Comment


      • #18
        only thing I noticed with a some driver releases that some builds set your monitor to 60Hz, despite having had it at 85Hz before ...

        make sure your 'loss' in sharpness is not caused by this.

        Cheers,
        Maggi

        PS: I don't use Win2k, so this might not be the problem you'r having, but it's definetely worth a shot ...

        PPS: APV, I perfectly understand your last post, but it can be that others really don't have that problem and thus you should not blame those for being incorrect or biased ... (different systems = different behaviour)
        Despite my nickname causing confusion, I am not female ...

        ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional
        Intel Core i7-3930K@4.3GHz
        be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 2
        4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX PC3-19200U@CR1
        2x MSI N670GTX PE OC (SLI)
        OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
        4x2TB Seagate Barracuda Green 5900.3 (2x4TB RAID0)
        Super Flower Golden Green Modular 800W
        Nanoxia Deep Silence 1
        LG BH10LS38
        LG DM2752D 27" 3D

        Comment


        • #19
          APV, as usual you are overreacting.

          Not only is this problem NOT universal, it's NOT consistent.

          I have it only at resolutions over 1024x768. When I posted my initial response I hadn't maxxed out my monitor yet.

          Some people don't have it at all.

          Please don't be judgemental. Or mental. Or a judge. Or an udgemene.

          - Gurm

          ------------------
          Listen up, you primitive screwheads! See this? This is my BOOMSTICK! Etc. etc.
          The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!

          I'm the least you could do
          If only life were as easy as you
          I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
          If only life were as easy as you
          I would still get screwed

          Comment


          • #20
            Are all of you, who see this drop in quality, using true dualhead mode? If so, does it get any better using stretched mode?

            Rags

            Comment


            • #21
              I'm seeing it in single-head mode.

              - Gurm

              ------------------
              Listen up, you primitive screwheads! See this? This is my BOOMSTICK! Etc. etc.
              The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!

              I'm the least you could do
              If only life were as easy as you
              I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
              If only life were as easy as you
              I would still get screwed

              Comment


              • #22
                Everything's fine here on Win2000, G450 32mb and the newest drivers.

                Running a 21" Sony G500

                Comment


                • #23
                  I saw the same behaviour with the 1440x1080 resolution I was running at. Reading Greebe's and Nuno's post, I've reverted back to 5.33, and wrote down all the monitor timings I'm using at 1440x1080.

                  I installed PD5.51 again, and entered the settings from 5.33, or the ones as close to those as possible. Now it's much better again (before the image wasn't 'stable' at 1440x1080 @85Hz, now it is).

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I had to re-enter the monitor timings. I'm at lower res but I think it's sharper than before.

                    [This message has been edited by The PIT (edited 03 March 2001).]
                    Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
                    Weather nut and sad git.

                    My Weather Page

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I have Win2K here. I have not noticed any drop in quality or sharpness from 5.33 to 5.51. But, I never fooled with any of the monitor timings, that may have something to do with it. I run 1280x960@85hz on my Sony 400PS.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I too have noticed the difference in clarity with the 5.51 drivers. Despite ensuring that I used the same monitor customization settings, the degraded display quality forced me back to the 5.33 drivers which appear much sharper. Single head mode, 1024x768@75Hz, see signature for other equip.

                        ------------------
                        MSI6163 Pro, 384MB PC133, P3700E@866, Sony 48X CD,Ricoh 121032 CDRW,IBM 30G ATA100, Vortex 2 SuperQuad,
                        Smartlink 10/100 NIC, etc. G400 32MB DH as well.
                        Office: Giga266A, XP1900+, 1GB PC2100. 80GB Maxtor, Matrox G550 Integraph 21", Sceptre 19"
                        Home:#1.Abit IS7, 512MB OCZ DDR 533, P4C2600 at 3260, LiteOn 411S DVDRW, LiteOn 481248 CDRW,WD 80G ATA100, Audigy, 2X IBM P202, Radeon 9600 Pro as well.
                        #2. TB 1.33G/KR7AR133/512MB PC2100. MSI GF4-4200TI, Maxtor 13.6/40G drives/Ricoh 121032 CDRW, Hitachi 8X DVD, AOpen 52X. etc.
                        #3. P3-700-512MB/BX6R2/GF2MX400/
                        etc. #4,#5 Various P2 with G400, G200.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X