Tweet
Haha, no kidding! My g400max is sooooo much faster than my Radeon VE, at least in Q3 and NFS5!
-
-
G400Max faster than Radeon VE?
Are you joking? I thought VE version of Radeon had the same performances of Gf2 MX-400, that is at least x2 faster than G400MAX.
How much faster?
ATHLON XP 2600; Abit KX7-333Raid; 1GB SDRAM DDR PC-3200 Corsair XMS; Matrox Parhelia AGP 256; HITACHI 7K250 250GB; HITACHI 120GXP 120GB; HITACHI 120GXP 60GB; Sound Blaster Audigy 2; Plextor DVDRW PX-716A; Plextor CDRW Premium -
The Radeon VE only has one rendering pipeline, so it's quite slow. But is it really "sooooo" much slower than your MAX?!?Comment
-
quite a bit slower, yesComment
-
Must be the buggy Ati drivers.
Comment
-
The Radeon VE also has some of the other features of the Radeon disabled, from what i remember there is no TnL unit and Hyper-Z is also disabled."And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz
Comment
-
Have tested a Radeon VE one time at work, and its a "carp" card. The first Hydravision cars from ATI I belive! I belive G400 is faster yes, perhaps because of the drivers from ATI...
Comment
Comment