it has been hinted several times that matrox "got help" with their parhelia opengl icd, can somebody enlighten us about this, or is this still under NDA?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
the new parhelia opengl icd, who wrote it?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ant
Some real professionals who really know OpenGL, should be quite an easy one for you to guessThis sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.
Comment
-
Yes, SGI or 3DLabs. And since 3DLabs will have a competing product out (P10), I think we can count them out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jon P. Inghram
SGI, great... we'll get OpenGL drivers that look very good, and can render large scale very complex 3D scenes at 5 fps, and also small scale, very simple 3D scenes at 5 fps.Last edited by TdB; 21 June 2002, 11:29.This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.
Comment
-
It's suspicious that the new 3dlabs product uses nearly the same memory interface as Parhelia... Both cards are not oriented to the same market. 3dlabs is graphic workstation oriented, and Parhelia, despite whatever Matrox can say, seems to be oriented for advanced users (DVD playback), hardcore gamers (Surround Gaming, FAAx16), video edit, and multiscreen workstations.
I smell here some kind of alliance, and it wouldn't surprise me that the "hidden" force behind the ICD is 3dlabs.
Comment
Comment