...would be a clock to clock comparison of Parhelia against a downclocked Ti4600 with 220/250 MHz.
That would be a fair comparison and it allowed to see what the strenghts and weaknesses of Parhelia´s design really are and which potential might be left for further exploration (more optimized drivers, higher clockspeed). Maybe this way one could find possible driver bottlenecks which usually get ironed out later in their developement.
I think at present P´s most hindering weakness is it´s low core clockspeed. One must be quite optimistic to expect comparable framerates in today´s games with only little more than 2/3 of the competitor´s clockspeeds.
Has anyone already done such a comparison?
That would be a fair comparison and it allowed to see what the strenghts and weaknesses of Parhelia´s design really are and which potential might be left for further exploration (more optimized drivers, higher clockspeed). Maybe this way one could find possible driver bottlenecks which usually get ironed out later in their developement.
I think at present P´s most hindering weakness is it´s low core clockspeed. One must be quite optimistic to expect comparable framerates in today´s games with only little more than 2/3 of the competitor´s clockspeeds.
Has anyone already done such a comparison?
Comment