Tweet
Something wrong on those benchmarks...
The infos from all those benchmarks are wrong.
It's just a feeling...
It's just a feeling...
-
Sat on a pile of deads, I enjoy my oysters. -
Yeah, right.
All the benchmarks are wrong and only the info from www.matrox.com is true.Last edited by mikeul; 25 June 2002, 13:49. -
keep it friendly, my friend
no matrox, no matroxusers.Comment
-
Slightly uncalled for.Originally posted by mikeul
Yeah, right.
Sore looser.
All the benchmarks are wrong and only the info from www.matrox.com is true.Comment
-
He edited it The PIT. Why don't you delete your post.<TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>Comment
-
Why should PIT delete his post, mikeul http://forums.murc.ws/search.php?s=&...searchid=40241 seems to be just a flamer.Main: Dual Xeon LV2.4Ghz@3.1Ghz | 3X21" | NVidia 6800 | 2Gb DDR | SCSI
Second: Dual PIII 1GHz | 21" Monitor | G200MMS + Quadro 2 Pro | 512MB ECC SDRAM | SCSI
Third: Apple G4 450Mhz | 21" Monitor | Radeon 8500 | 1,5Gb SDRAM | SCSIComment
-
no i think he is an immature idiot
no matrox, no matroxusers.Comment
-
I'm at zero tolerance for name calling today.
It's not going to be allowed.
This will not become a place like the [H] and Anand forums.
THREAD CLOSEDCore2 Duo E7500 2.93, Asus P5Q Pro Turbo, 4gig 1066 DDR2, 1gig Asus ENGTS250, SB X-Fi Gamer ,WD Caviar Black 1tb, Plextor PX-880SA, Dual Samsung 2494sComment
Comment