ok, somebody give me a straight answer here....

[az]

OK Wombat, they might be not as complex design-wise and not NEARLY as versatile, but they ARE monsters when it comes to just transistor count (OK, they are not quite as big as a power 4, but...). Sorry if that was worded wrong, thought about re-wording it but was too lazy

AZ

[KvHagedorn]

Well, Parhelia may be more complex than SOME CPUs, but certainly not the one occupying Wombat's working hours.

[az]

Well, Parhelia certainly IS more complex than things we USED to call CPUs (now NASA are the only ones still doing so ). I don't think it's as complex as McKinley, though, right

No offense meant, Wombat. I just wanted to say that I don't think calling newer graphics chips "GPUs" is that wrong.

AZ