Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

J.C apologies...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • J.C apologies...

    I need to apologize to Matrox -- their implementation of hardware displacement mapping is NOT quad based. I was thinking about a certain other companies proposed approach. Matrox's implementation actually looks quite good, so even if we don't use it because of the geometry amplification issues, I think it will serve the noble purpose of killing dead any proposal to implement a quad based solution.
    Shame it still will not be used but there ya go!
    Cheers, Reckless

  • #2
    even if we dont isnt the same as wont.

    And the other issue of OpenGL 2 might be more important for Matrox within the context of 'professional'
    G400 32 D/H, PIII650@840, ABIT-BE6II, MX300

    Comment

    Working...
    X