New driver performance Impact?

[SteveC]

Supposedly Anand used Matrox Parhelia (128MB) - v2.26 drivers - he didn't! I wish these sites would actually read the version properly:

v1.00.01.226 is what he had.

[Ant]

That's what we all want but badgering the beta testers and making comments about Matrox forcing people not to talk is not the way to do it.

Originally posted by mikeul
Ok, I won't drag this furhter, I just wanted to help out the matrox community. After all, if things went better with new drivers, those who lost interest with the reviews might regain interest

[Edward]

Originally posted by SteveC
Supposedly Anand used Matrox Parhelia (128MB) - v2.26 drivers - he didn't! I wish these sites would actually read the version properly:

v1.00.01.226 is what he had.

Well what's matters is that performance did increase a little, to bad it's not an in detph review as alway's, so aniso degrees and performance is still unclear.

These are some serious things customers want to know.

[Wark0]

The performance DID not increase because you can't compare performance in the new and the old article.

Just have a look at GeForce4 Ti performance ... they are also faster in the latest article ...with the same driver.

Since the testbed are equal, the performance increase come from the newer build (28th june) of UT2003.