Even if matrox has successfully corrected the anisotropic filter for the P drivers, R9700 can still filter than P right? According to the P whitepapers, P can do "8 sample anisotropic and trilinear filtering on 4 dual-textured pixels/clock" or "16 sample anisotropic filtering on 4 SINGLE-TEXTURED pixel/clock" soooo does it mean P can do both:
Bilinear + 16-tap aniso = 64 samples.
AND
Trilinear + 8-Tap aniso = 64 samples.
Just wondering
Bilinear + 16-tap aniso = 64 samples.
AND
Trilinear + 8-Tap aniso = 64 samples.
Just wondering
As for the Parhelia's specs, I went to Matrox site and looked at the AF feature link here:
It didn't provide much help and after delving through a few reviews I can't find anything that details something contrary to the information proceeding this.
When the future drivers arrive that unlock 8x and I assume 4x the break down of samples would be like so.
Bilinear + 2-Tap = 8 Samples
Bilinear + 4-Tap = 16 Samples
Bilinear + 8-Tap = 32 Samples
Trilinear + 2-Tap = 16 Samples
Trilinear + 4-Tap = 32 Samples
Trilinear + 8-Tap = 64 Samples
So long as the performance claim of being able to lay down all 64 samples in a clock remains true, it should make for a performance competitive option compared to the GF3/4.
If you have a link to a white paper that details the Parhelia being able to do something different than the above I would be most interested in reading it.
Comment