Tweet
Originally posted by Greebe
Anyone could have told you the that... or heck even you could have tested it out for yourself
Anyone could have told you the that... or heck even you could have tested it out for yourself
-
Too lazy to test myself....Let us return to the moon, to stay!!! -
Note: If he was running anything other than a VIA chipset it would be Slower!
Fsb overclocking on a SiS or Amd chipset sucks ass!
I dare any SiS owner to crank up your fsb levels to his. Then tell me how rock stable your board is ;^)Oh my god MAGNUM!Comment
-
Hmmm that's interesting Funk-d-Munk I've had mine set to 187mHz and never had any stability issues...
Tis ok, you can eat your HAT now
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss
"Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark TwainComment
-
seems like i started off a false alarm here, i was bioshacking my parhelia at the same time as i used the overclocking utility. i have just discovered by experiment that the o/cing utility overides the bioshack and treats the card like its at its stock speeds so as i have a bulk card then the o/c software 'sees' the card as 200/500 clocked even though the memory is bios hacked to 600 mhz. running a bios hack of 228/600 with no software overclocker returned the following score.
my memory will in fact not clock above 610 stably and the core max's at 228.
sorry for the false alarm but an interesting discovery about the o/c tool i thinkis a flower best picked in it's prime or greater withered away by time?
Talk about a dream, try to make it real.Comment
-
Wow Greebe I have to hand it to you that is a great fsb speed for a Sis. Most all reviews I've read of Sis boards show minimal fsb overclocking. Via is still best in this one area, but I'm even more impressed with SiS boards, than I already was, now that fsb o/c'ing isn't as hamperd as I was led to believe.Oh my god MAGNUM!Comment
-
IF
(via = "unstable")
AND
(sis = "slow" + "unclockable")
THEN
echo "Is there any other choices?"
ENDIFP4 Northwood 1.8GHz@2.7GHz 1.65V Albatron PX845PEV Pro
Running two Dell 2005FPW 20" Widescreen LCD
And of course, Matrox Parhelia | My Matrox histroy: Mill-I, Mill-II, Mystique, G400, ParheliaComment
-
Yeah....NForce....Asus A7N266-C....and the NForce2...Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!Comment
-
Hi there.
Here is my result,nothing overvlocked here.
Looks quite normal but it seems that multi texturing fill rate is not effected by overclocking ?
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4757048ASUS P5B-E ;2GB G.Skill DDR2 Ram; C2D6420;lub 3D X1950pro ;SoundBlaster X-Fi;WinXPComment
-
are you sure you posted the right link ?Originally posted by Faramir1966
Hi there.
Here is my result,nothing overvlocked here.
Looks quite normal but it seems that multi texturing fill rate is not effected by overclocking ?
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4757048
your FSB is reported as high as 142MHz, but in your description you said it would be running at 100MHz and additionally, your fillrate scores seems to be too high for standard Parhelia clocks as well ...Despite my nickname causing confusion, I am not female ...
ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional
Intel Core i7-3930K@4.3GHz
be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 2
4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX PC3-19200U@CR1
2x MSI N670GTX PE OC (SLI)
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
4x2TB Seagate Barracuda Green 5900.3 (2x4TB RAID0)
Super Flower Golden Green Modular 800W
Nanoxia Deep Silence 1
LG BH10LS38
LG DM2752D 27" 3DComment
-
Interesting driver revision: 6.13.10.6015Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!Comment
-
Reevalueating SiS seems to be at hand (again)(sis = "slow" + "unclockable")
I'm hitting in excess of 1.81 gHz (XP2200+) with an Athlon 1600+ (1.4 gHz) when running the FSB @ 172 on a MSI 745 Ultra (read: SiS 745 chipset)"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss
"Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark TwainComment
-
That also seems to be about the limit for the NForce415D-powered Asus A7N266C....
SIS746/NForce2 should be able to go much higher...
My FSB is currently at 179mhz on my Epox 8K3A+, but I've taken it to 190mhz and beyond...
That's why an Epox board for any chipset is a plus...Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!Comment
-
So as I've said repeatedly before I'm not limited to 172... I've had mine above 185 and beyond before.
See PM"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss
"Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark TwainComment
-
Absolutely.are you sure you posted the right link ?
I neve change my fsb since my system wont run stable at 133fsb.
Sisft Sandra also reports my fsb at 100mhz wich should be correct.
Don´t know why 3dmark reports such a high clock....ASUS P5B-E ;2GB G.Skill DDR2 Ram; C2D6420;lub 3D X1950pro ;SoundBlaster X-Fi;WinXPComment
-
Hi,
This is the result of my PIII system, nothing overclocked.
System1:
Asus P4T533, Pentium IV 3,06GHz, 512MB SAMSUNG Rimm 4200, MAXTOR DiamondMax Plus60 20GB, MAXTOR DiamondMax Plus60 60Gb, MATROX PARHELIA, MATROX RTX100, ULTRAPLEX 40MAX, PLEXWRITER 12/10/32S, 2 x IIYAMA Vision Master Pro510
System2:
ASUS P4T533, Pentium IV 3,06 GHz, 512 MB SAMSUNG Rimm 4200, MAXTOR DiamondMax Plus60 20GB, MAXTOR DiamondMax Plus60 60Gb, SAPPHIRE 9800XT, CREATIVE AudigyII, ULTRAPLEX 40MAX, PLEXWRITER 40/12/40S, 2 x IIYAMA Vision Master Pro510Comment
Comment