Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Matrox: a tradition of image quality excellence

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by UberLord
    Maybe you want to put a tag note in saying that technically, 220Mhz is actually 217Mhz
    LOL
    + LOL Pace
    no matrox, no matroxusers.

    Comment


    • #32
      Soupy: I don't think MURCers really want to attack Matrox like Dogbert said. We are just upset and dissapointed about Matrox' policy lately regarding a few things.
      no matrox, no matroxusers.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by thop
        Soupy: I don't think MURCers really want to attack Matrox like Dogbert said. We are just upset and dissapointed about Matrox' policy lately regarding a few things.

        i completely understand. i'm sincerely sympathetic. i'm hoping as much as all of you are that there will be a turn-around coming.
        OFFICIAL EX- EMPLOYEE

        <font size="1">"So now I'm dreaming<br>For myself I'm understanding <br>Performing there, one hundred thousand fans would gather one and all <br>And so decided, we could rule it all if we should <br>Dance all away across the greatest city in the nether world..."<p>- Central Park 09/24/03</font>

        Comment


        • #34
          So, you think the same as us?

          :fingers-crossed for the turn around:

          P.
          Meet Jasmine.
          flickr.com/photos/pace3000

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Pace
            So, you think the same as us?

            :fingers-crossed for the turn around:

            P.
            i plead the 5th. i commend the attempt, though.
            OFFICIAL EX- EMPLOYEE

            <font size="1">"So now I'm dreaming<br>For myself I'm understanding <br>Performing there, one hundred thousand fans would gather one and all <br>And so decided, we could rule it all if we should <br>Dance all away across the greatest city in the nether world..."<p>- Central Park 09/24/03</font>

            Comment


            • #36
              An anouncement on 5th?

              Comment


              • #37
                No, 5th Amendment rights - to stay silent I think (but USers will have to correct me here...).
                DM says: Crunch with Matrox Users@ClimatePrediction.net

                Comment


                • #38
                  Right to stay silent because you will incriminate yourself.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    5th Amendment:
                    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
                    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

                    "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Thanks Greebe!
                      DM says: Crunch with Matrox Users@ClimatePrediction.net

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Indiana:
                        Exactly. And RamDAC speed has everything to do with the quality of the analog output... NOT!
                        Just a small point, but where did Tempest suggest it did?
                        Meet Jasmine.
                        flickr.com/photos/pace3000

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Since I, too, reacted after Tempest's post :

                          Tempest did not. I think Indiana reacted to 3dfx's post. Which did not actually state that RAMDAC was the only factor ; only that the difference in IQ could come from the RAMDAC's speed. (Though not in so many words. Maybe a little misunderstanding here ?)

                          Indiana, I think, and I, for sure, were only reminding people that the RAMDAC is not the only factor in image quality, by far.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Yeah, don't tell us - tell Anand. Every review of a graphics card he tells us how new 5GHz RAMDACs make for ultrasharp output.

                            S'pose it might even be Matrox to blame - back in the G400 days I recall they bummed up their UltraSharp 360MHz RAMDAC - people might just have confused the 2 from back then. Or maybe earlier
                            Meet Jasmine.
                            flickr.com/photos/pace3000

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X