I know this has already been discussed to a certain extent but what were the final results? At what point is the P the bottleneck? The reason I am asking. . .I have a P4 2.26 as mentioned in my sig. . .would I benefit at all by going to a 2.8 or possibly 3.06 P4?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How does the P scale?
Collapse
X
-
How does the P scale?
My "Baby": Shuttle SS51G, P4@2.26 Ghz 533 FSB, 80 GB Western Digital Caviar "Special Edition" Hard Drive 7,200 RPM w/8 MB Cache, 512 MB Corsair PC2700 with Heat Spreaders, Pioneer DVD Drive (w/sexy slot load ), and of course a Matrox Parhelia Retail Vid CardTags: None
-
my experience has shown that the Parhelia is the bottleneck no matter what speed processor is used. to boot, my experience has shows it to be even more of a bottleneck when used in conjunction with a slower processor.
that being said, i honestly don't know if that "small" of a jump would give that much of a performance increase for the cost."And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz
-
I guess what I meant was: "When does the P stop gaining performance?" So I would see ZERO change if I upgraded my CPU? Just wondering because obviously I wouldn't upgrade then .My "Baby": Shuttle SS51G, P4@2.26 Ghz 533 FSB, 80 GB Western Digital Caviar "Special Edition" Hard Drive 7,200 RPM w/8 MB Cache, 512 MB Corsair PC2700 with Heat Spreaders, Pioneer DVD Drive (w/sexy slot load ), and of course a Matrox Parhelia Retail Vid Card
Comment
-
Guess I'll be able to tell ya in about a week or so. Putting 3.06ghz of goodness in my system :-)
LeechWah! Wah!
In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.
Comment
-
Fairly good I say.
Just got a new CPU.
3DMark03 doesn't increase almost at all.
But games FPS increases about 15%, which is pretty good considering the memory bandwidth is LOWERED.
was: p4 1.9@2.2, mem 314 cl2
is: p4 1.8@2.7, mem 300 cl2
EDIT:
actually, more than 15%, about 25% it is.P4 Northwood 1.8GHz@2.7GHz 1.65V Albatron PX845PEV Pro
Running two Dell 2005FPW 20" Widescreen LCD
And of course, Matrox Parhelia | My Matrox histroy: Mill-I, Mill-II, Mystique, G400, Parhelia
Comment
-
Just ran my shiney new 3.06ghz Hyper-threading CPU up against 3dMark2001 and it scored only 8200 (8300 with Hyperthreading turned off) Just about the same as the 2.4 P4. nothing is overclocked, though so far I only have 256mb of DDR400 memory, since I was too poor to go for the 512mb, who knows if that would help more or not.
LeechWah! Wah!
In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penises, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.
Comment
-
I'm going to go from a KT133/Duron 700MHz/G400 to an 746FX/AthlonXP 2GHz/Parhelia. I'm hoping for a decent increase in UT2003 smoothness.[size=1]D3/\/7YCR4CK3R
Ryzen: Asrock B450M Pro4, Ryzen 5 2600, 16GB G-Skill Ripjaws V Series DDR4 PC4-25600 RAM, 1TB Seagate SATA HD, 256GB myDigital PCIEx4 M.2 SSD, Samsung LI24T350FHNXZA 24" HDMI LED monitor, Klipsch Promedia 4.2 400, Win11
Home: M1 Mac Mini 8GB 256GB
Surgery: HP Stream 200-010 Mini Desktop,Intel Celeron 2957U Processor, 6 GB RAM, ADATA 128 GB SSD, Win 10 home ver 22H2
Frontdesk: Beelink T4 8GB
Comment
-
you will see a huge increase in UT2003. i noticed a massive difference in performance when using different speed processors on that game. very cpu bound."And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz
Comment
Comment