A brief reassume of the problem:
After installing a Matrox Card on Win2k, the user discover that Matrox's drivers don't care to ask the monitor wich refresh rates it supports, giving the user a max of 85Hz into monitor settings and 60Hz in D3D and OGL games.
Pure shit. So, asking to Matrox, we all know the reply: it's Microsoft fault, it's a Win2K problem. It's a feature.
Ok, I've installed a few ATI and nVidia cards in the last days, all over a Win2K system, no SP. I've installed even an old S3 card on the same system. I've tried with DX8 and 9, and with old and new drives.
Guess the surprise?
Every card has detected the monitor settings, used the maximum refresh rate in OGL games, in D3D games, in Windows desktop...
Back to my beloved G400, and still stuck with 60Hz and 85Hz on a monitor capable of 120...
I know I'm boring...but why the hell we can't have a decent video driver?
After installing a Matrox Card on Win2k, the user discover that Matrox's drivers don't care to ask the monitor wich refresh rates it supports, giving the user a max of 85Hz into monitor settings and 60Hz in D3D and OGL games.
Pure shit. So, asking to Matrox, we all know the reply: it's Microsoft fault, it's a Win2K problem. It's a feature.
Ok, I've installed a few ATI and nVidia cards in the last days, all over a Win2K system, no SP. I've installed even an old S3 card on the same system. I've tried with DX8 and 9, and with old and new drives.
Guess the surprise?
Every card has detected the monitor settings, used the maximum refresh rate in OGL games, in D3D games, in Windows desktop...
Back to my beloved G400, and still stuck with 60Hz and 85Hz on a monitor capable of 120...
I know I'm boring...but why the hell we can't have a decent video driver?
Comment