Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

G450 PCI & overlocking

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • G450 PCI & overlocking

    the AGP G4xx cards handle high AGP speeds like 75MHz pretty well.

    Will a Matrox G450 DDR PCI handle high PCI speeds well too? Like 37MHz? Thanks.
    Matrox G4x0 32mb SG RAM DVI

  • #2
    I wouldn't be worried about the video card, I'd worry about your hard drives.
    Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: G450 PCI & overlocking

      Originally posted by G400SG16mb
      the AGP G4xx cards handle high AGP speeds like 75MHz pretty well.

      Will a Matrox G450 DDR PCI handle high PCI speeds well too? Like 37MHz? Thanks.
      37 Mhz compared to 33 Mhz may not be a big step, but... if you overclock your PCI bus, will your other equipment be able to handle it? Will your PCI soundcard start disturbing sound output? I e.g. have a promise harddrive controller and would never risk data corruption just for slightly faster dragging of windows ;-) I never understood you overclocking people...

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm not naive.
        Matrox G4x0 32mb SG RAM DVI

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by G400SG16mb
          I'm not naive.
          Then why ask if you already know?
          "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

          "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

          Comment


          • #6
            how well do the G400 chips scale?

            Originally posted by Greebe
            Then why ask if you already know?
            This leads me to a more interesting question: how well do the G 4x0 chips scale when using a stronger CPU? Lets say, upgrading from a 800 Mhz class x86 CPU to a 1/1.4/2 Ghz CPU? How much gain in speed can a user expect? This surely makes more sense than pushing the PCI bus.
            And unless Matrox greatly enhances its Linux support for the newer chips i will stay married with the G400;-)

            Comment


            • #7
              My G400MAX seemed to scale up past 1GHz a bit and then there wasn't much if any differance past 1.4GHz.

              With a PCI card obviously you'll be bandwidth limited by the pci bus well before the cpu is the limiting factor, so yeah a higher pci speed might help some.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by rylan
                My G400MAX seemed to scale up past 1GHz a bit and then there wasn't much if any differance past 1.4GHz.
                Maybe. Greebe and I (mostly Greebe) were among the first people to mess around with scaling. Greebe found the MAX stopped benefitting once the CPU was a K7-850 or so. Then again, it depends on how much of your CPU is used by other things.
                Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                Comment


                • #9
                  For one I've been overclocking cpu's for over 20 years now. Also invented the first commercial GFD for OCing K7's. Was running hundreds of mHz faster than just about anyone else back then. Add to that I was a beta tester for Matrox and pushed the G4x0's to the extreme both in core, memory speed and in bus frequency.

                  That's how I know.
                  "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

                  "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    of course, it could be pointed out that the PCI Busmastering support on the G450 is far more of a limiting bottleneck than the acctual graphics core or the processor.

                    edit: clarified broken brain thoughts.
                    Last edited by DGhost; 7 July 2004, 16:54.
                    "And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X