Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The banding issue

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Wombat
    Yes, and you expect their behavior to improve. But Matrox refused to acknowledge the banding even existed, and even when they did they said it was perfectly acceptable.
    Like nVidia did with most of the bugs in the first Gf3 revisions for example, and via did with their pci-bug... and what should they do? Take all P's back and kill their company instantly?

    Originally posted by Wombat
    Of course, Matrox also makes it easier by not having any worthwhile products in the future.
    That's not the point here, right?
    We talked about buying a Matrox product in generally, not gaming specific and not today...
    P IV 3,06 Ghz, GA-8ihxp i850e, 512 MB PC-1066 RDRam, Parhelia 128 mb 8x, 40 + 60 gb IBM 7200 upm/2048 kb HD, Samtron 96 P 19", black icemat, Razer Boomslang 2100 krz-2 + mousebungee, Videologic sonic fury, Creative Soundworks

    Comment


    • #17
      nVidia owned up to it, and later products improved. I still don't buy Via.
      Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

      Comment


      • #18
        Well, but if you think about the claimed partial DX9 support retired after two years the story sound a little bit differrent. I like Matrox card. I like the way these card are constructed. I like the quality. But i pay much money for a quality card, i don't want surprise. For the other thing, as i ever said, i want to know more info from Matrox: news, rumors, spec and other goodies.

        Comment


        • #19
          News, rumors and specs about what?

          Comment


          • #20
            I haven't seen the banding issue on my Parhelia (4x, 128 MB) ...
            Then again, my PSU is 510 W (650 W peak) , a PC Power&Cooling 510XE .
            Initially, I had a CRT as primary monitor (usually @85 Hz), now it is a DVI LCD (so I wouldn't be able to see it if it were to occur).


            Jörg
            pixar
            Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow. (James Dean)

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by VJ
              I haven't seen the banding issue on my Parhelia (4x, 128 MB) ...
              Then again, my PSU is 510 W (650 W peak) , a PC Power&Cooling 510XE .
              Initially, I had a CRT as primary monitor (usually @85 Hz), now it is a DVI LCD (so I wouldn't be able to see it if it were to occur).


              Jörg
              PSU has nothing to do with it. It was an early theory, but myself and other people upgraded their PSUs and it had no effect.
              Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

              Comment


              • #22
                The banding issue is due to a poor grounding scheme in the ramdac
                "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

                "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

                Comment


                • #23
                  Did cooling affect it? i.e. when using a better cooling device, was the effect less noticeable?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Cooling will never compensate for a bad ground.
                    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

                    "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Greebe
                      Cooling will never compensate for a bad ground.
                      What if you had really powerful cooling that caused a flow of charged ions towards a grounding point?
                      Last edited by xortam; 10 September 2004, 11:24.
                      <TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Don't think the package would survive supercooling it that much
                        "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

                        "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          ||ex Matrox beta tester||

                          Hey Greebe want to be a beta tester
                          Last edited by Amiga Blitter; 11 September 2004, 05:59.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Greebe
                            Cooling will never compensate for a bad ground.
                            I was thinking to reduce the "bad" flow of electrons, but cooling has got nothing to do with it...a redesign is what you need...

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Wombat
                              PSU has nothing to do with it. It was an early theory, but myself and other people upgraded their PSUs and it had no effect.
                              Oops, I didn't know...


                              Jörg
                              pixar
                              Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow. (James Dean)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X