TurboGL or GLSetup?

[Jeffrey]

Ok, just a simple question and since I'm pretty new here

What is the performance difference between the latest build of TurboGL and GLSetup? Is there any improvement of GLSetup over the TurboGL? Since the release date of GLSetup v1.08 is slightly newer than Matrox's.

Much appreciated ^_^

[Kruzin]

GLSetup is not from Matrox. Don't bother with it.

[Groove Diz]

hmm...
if you have a matrox g400 it will dubbel your
fps in 640x480 forexample whit TurboGL
it allso tune all your rez up to 1600x1280
so kruzin is vrong

------------------
my sys: (Asus)
P]|[ 450mhz
mga G200 8mb
128mb pc100
Yamaha s90
& awe64
Win98

[This message has been edited by Groove Diz (edited 14 November 1999).]

[This message has been edited by Groove Diz (edited 14 November 1999).]

[Rags]

Just listen to Kruzin, he is very correct.

[Kruzin]

Groove- try reading before posting.

I did not say not to use TurboGL (which is a part of the 5.30 driver package)

I said don't use GLSetup (which is a 3rd party conglomeration of a bunch of video drivers which was put together mostly for Q3...these drivers are NOT current)

[Jeffrey]

Thanks for the input guys, I'll keep my hands off GLSetup.

Cheers

[Groove Diz]

ok... sorry

[jerryka6bwz]

In GLsetup it sends you to the MATROX web page to use the 5.30 drivers!

------------------
No dummy, its rape, pilage, and THEN burn.