Hi there,
I was wondering why I only got about 20 fps in quake3 in Win2k. Then I tried changing some BIOS settings. I read in another thread, that I should disable all video shadowing, vga palette snooping and BIOS caching, so I figured I should disable Video RAM cachable as well. But when I turned it back on, my q3 framerate doubled!! I am now running quake3 in win2k at about 50 fps (after some tweaking and overclocking my G400 a little more
High quality, 800x600, 32 bit, bilinear filtering, high quality sound, 3d sound off
G400 DH 32MB @ 173/200/173
Single Celeron 366@550MHz
No more rebooting to win9x for a decent game of q3a! ;-))
So DON'T disable Video RAM cachable if you have that option in your BIOS!
Video BIOS Cachable didn't seem to make much of a difference. Can anyone tell me why everyone is saying I should disable it?
Greets,
Jorg
------------------
______________________
I am the Jorg, resistance is futile.
© StarTrek: First Contact
I was wondering why I only got about 20 fps in quake3 in Win2k. Then I tried changing some BIOS settings. I read in another thread, that I should disable all video shadowing, vga palette snooping and BIOS caching, so I figured I should disable Video RAM cachable as well. But when I turned it back on, my q3 framerate doubled!! I am now running quake3 in win2k at about 50 fps (after some tweaking and overclocking my G400 a little more
High quality, 800x600, 32 bit, bilinear filtering, high quality sound, 3d sound off
G400 DH 32MB @ 173/200/173
Single Celeron 366@550MHz
No more rebooting to win9x for a decent game of q3a! ;-))
So DON'T disable Video RAM cachable if you have that option in your BIOS!
Video BIOS Cachable didn't seem to make much of a difference. Can anyone tell me why everyone is saying I should disable it?
Greets,
Jorg
------------------
______________________
I am the Jorg, resistance is futile.
© StarTrek: First Contact
Comment