Medal of Honor - EA speaks

[xbnmx]

Lol...

A Titanium 200, talk about a waste of money...

[matroxofhonor?]

Originally posted by xbnmx
Because Matrox has the best 2D and I've really got'en into playing ports of Doom and heretic lately, which use 2D engines...

Stick to 2d boy, I think Jungle.com has a special on Commodore 64 Software at the mo'

[matroxofhonor?]

http://gamershq.madonion.com/

<u>VIDEO CARD HALL OF FAME</u>


1. ATI Radeon 8500



2. NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 500



3. <b>NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti 200</b>



4. NVIDIA GeForce3



5. ATI Radeon 7500



6. NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra



7. NVIDIA GeForce2 GTS/Pro/Ti



8. ATI RADEON DDR



9. NVIDIA GeForce DDR



10. ATI RADEON SDR

[Novdid]

That's based on 3dmark 2001 scores. As the drivers have improved a lot since the GF3 (non Ti) came, the Ti200 is faster in overall score postings, but the original GF3 is faster.

At this point a Ti200 or a Ti500 is a waste of money as you can get Radeon 8500 retails for less than $150. And soo...

[Wombat]

Well, some of us don't want to support a company that tried to fake benchmarks (quack3 anybody?). Besides, My Ti200 is pretty damn fast.

[xbnmx]

Right...

I don't support Ati anymore because of their cheating drivers, nor do i support nVidia for their stealing of 3dfx technolegy, buying out the company when they saw that they were going to lose the lawsuit, no longer supporting the cards, not releasing the source code, and then trying to buy back all the cards, both companys are evil, Evil, EVil, EVIl, EVIL!

[Parhelia Pro256]

Too bad it doesn't test how long before you'll need stronger glasses

It's crystal clear

[Yanee]

hehe, ea's jerk support

I've tried mohaa on my friends TNT2 pro-based ASUS-V3800 card...
If EA calls THIS performance 'SUPPORTED', then yes, G400 *is* supported
Ofcourse, the TNT2 is not faster that G400 the only real difference is the picture quality.