If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Funniest article I have read in ages. Shame the author didn't mean it that way.
Must be the only place ever on THG that uses "0" as the left-hand end of the x-axis when showing 3D Marks. And the comments simply do not tie in with what the graphs show (the 3dmark one)...
Yes the results was all over the line that the differences in OS made no difference to performance... 1-2 frames more or less is = performance in my book... I'd like to know the standard error in that kind of setup was probably more.
But did anyone notice he didn't mention Matrox ONCE during his whole review ?
Cobos
My Specs
AMD XP 1800+, MSI KT3 Ultra1, Matrox G400 32MB DH, IBM 9ES UW SCSI, Plextor 32X SCSI, Plextor 8x/2x CDRW SCSI, Toshiba 4.8X DVD ROM IDE, IBM 30GB 75GXP, IBM 60GB 60GXP, 120GB Maxtor 540X, Tekram DC390F UW, Santa Cruz Soundcard, Eizo 17'' F56 and Eizo 21'' T965' Selfmodded case with 2 PSU's.
just to put this "review" into perspective and to enlighten the ones that don't know it, Lars Weinand is the webmaster of Germany's biggest NVidia fan site (www.rivastation.com) ...
Despite my nickname causing confusion, I am not female ...
Comment