Holy s&=t look at this!!

[Guru]

http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/s...untry_919.html
Take a look at #9!!!!!!!!!

------------------
PIII450@558, ABIT BX6-2, 256RAM, G400MAX, SBLIVE, HOTROD-UDMA66
Join the MURC SETI team @ <A HREF="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678


" TARGET=_blank>http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678


</A>

[Guru]

And what the hell is a SETIdoubler? http://www.and.or.jp/~metys/seti.html

------------------
PIII450@558, ABIT BX6-2, 256RAM, G400MAX, SBLIVE, HOTROD-UDMA66
Join the MURC SETI team @ <A HREF="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678


" TARGET=_blank>http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/cgi?cmd=team_join_form&id=25678


</A>


[This message has been edited by Guru (edited 27 May 2000).]

[Assimilator1]

Hmmm ,I think they're cheating ,someone should tell SETI@home.

Strange that they have nearly 100 members with 0 WU's?a cover perhaps?

------------------
I guess I won't recruit for my team here TA

[paulcs]

They must have some awful fast computers in Viet Nam.

Paul
paulcs@flashcom.net

[Compton]

I checked out the setidoubler thing. I'm a bit disappointed, I was hoping to get 1600 WUs tonight. It seems to just do a batch download and then process them in order. It doesn't seem to be anything special. They probably don't understand what the word double means.

[jms]

The program seems to be for buffering WUs on a dual CPU system, hence doubler.

Jan

[This message has been edited by jms (edited 29 May 2000).]

[Compton]

well then i need to find another CPU...

[KvHagedorn]

The many members might be a cover thing. Look also at the two "other" members who seem to be crunching at an average of a minute or two.. are these aliases for the #1 guy? He must have figured out how to manually alter the result file or something.

------------------
Kind Regards,

KvH

[SteveC]

sad....

------------------
Cheers,
Steve

"Life is what we make of it, yet most of us just fake"

[CharlesWA]

#9 (21.1 sec. avg. for 984 WUs) and #82 (2 min., 17.6 sec. avg. for 99 WUs) also look very suspecious.

Is it time to call in the SETI Police to check this out? Is there even such a thing?

What's the fastest legitimate time for a "standard" work unit that anyone has ever heard of (not including those ones that SETI runs through in just a few minutes)? What type of hardware was it on?

Charles

[Rattledagger]

Charles, if you look on http://seti.mynoggin.net/cgi-bin/table.cgi
you will see the fastest is 45 minutes.
Since this bench-unit doesn't have gaussian it's faster, but around 10% doesn't have gaussian.