Thanks Assim. I think I may have gone a little too light on the thermal paste. I'll take things apart in a while and try again.
According to Intel my CPU's "Thermal Spec" is 90 degrees C, so I doubut I did any damage to it, even when it ran up to 90 or a bit above.
That's assuming it actually went that high. I skimmed that thread you guys have going on the ASUS board. I'm going to check out the bios and PC Probe versions. I'm pretty sure my board has 1003 out of the box, but maybe the new revision is out of beta by now (or soon, hopefully).
If everything checks out, then I'm back to wondering why I can't run at 133 FSB/600 Core. There's always a chance that between clocking the memory at 100 Mhz and the FSB at 133 Mhz the chipset may be unstable. Maybe not under "normal" use, but under the constant pounding of SETI. I'm just going to have to order that PC133 RAM sooner than later...
Charles
According to Intel my CPU's "Thermal Spec" is 90 degrees C, so I doubut I did any damage to it, even when it ran up to 90 or a bit above.
That's assuming it actually went that high. I skimmed that thread you guys have going on the ASUS board. I'm going to check out the bios and PC Probe versions. I'm pretty sure my board has 1003 out of the box, but maybe the new revision is out of beta by now (or soon, hopefully).
If everything checks out, then I'm back to wondering why I can't run at 133 FSB/600 Core. There's always a chance that between clocking the memory at 100 Mhz and the FSB at 133 Mhz the chipset may be unstable. Maybe not under "normal" use, but under the constant pounding of SETI. I'm just going to have to order that PC133 RAM sooner than later...
Charles
Comment