Fastest seti@murcers for Jul 3-10

[Ees]

<TABLE BORDER=1><TR><TH>name</TH><TH>wus</TH><TH>hours</TH><TH>average</TH></TR><TR><TD>Rags</TD><TD>36</TD><TD>83.50</TD><TD>2h 19m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Manex</TD><TD>144</TD><TD>441.62</TD><TD>3h 4m</TD></TR><TR><TD>jms</TD><TD>23</TD><TD>87.66</TD><TD>3h 49m</TD></TR><TR><TD>cjolley</TD><TD>11</TD><TD>55.21</TD><TD>5h 1m</TD></TR><TR><TD>cancer</TD><TD>12</TD><TD>60.85</TD><TD>5h 4m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Mark F.</TD><TD>132</TD><TD>701.28</TD><TD>5h 19m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Swing</TD><TD>17</TD><TD>94.77</TD><TD>5h 34m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Eye MD</TD><TD>8</TD><TD>45.15</TD><TD>5h 39m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Guyver</TD><TD>15</TD><TD>87.66</TD><TD>5h 51m</TD></TR><TR><TD>giskard</TD><TD>38</TD><TD>223.10</TD><TD>5h 52m</TD></TR><TR><TD>KvHagedorn</TD><TD>58</TD><TD>350.64</TD><TD>6h 3m</TD></TR><TR><TD>VSA</TD><TD>56</TD><TD>350.64</TD><TD>6h 16m</TD></TR><TR><TD>hbitsch</TD><TD>14</TD><TD>87.66</TD><TD>6h 16m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Winwiz</TD><TD>67</TD><TD>438.30</TD><TD>6h 33m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Negative Saucer</TD><TD>16</TD><TD>106.80</TD><TD>6h 40m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Atelier Media</TD><TD>65</TD><TD>438.30</TD><TD>6h 45m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Jorden</TD><TD>8</TD><TD>54.35</TD><TD>6h 48m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Guru</TD><TD>15</TD><TD>102.03</TD><TD>6h 48m</TD></TR><TR><TD>paulcs</TD><TD>103</TD><TD>701.28</TD><TD>6h 49m</TD></TR><TR><TD>Fleabus</TD><TD>6</TD><TD>40.93</TD><TD>6h 49m</TD></TR></TABLE>

Martin

[Jorden]

See what a lucky fluked WU of 10.3 seconds can do? Now I'm still in the top 20

Jord, fighting his way back into the Top 100 as well, now going for place 95 at least

[ruud vd merkt]

Give it a go...

One computer has been crunching DVD -> VCD. Not good for the average Wu time

------------------
Handle: WinWiz
Asus P3B-f PIII 558 G400Max 256Mb 57 Gb SbLive Plextor 12432 & Ultraplex 40max Hp 970 Cxi Hp Scanjet 3c Iiyama Vm450

[Rattledagger]

ruud vd merkt, if you're not using win9x or graphics version, doing other things shouldn't have much impact on the wu-times.

On the top list, it will be interesting seeing if Rags still haves the number one spot then he is forced to upgrade to version 3.

[Jorden]

Rattledagger, since I've never been forced to use version 2.0 or 2.04, and am still using version 1.06 (same as Rags), how and when will we be forced to use version 3 then?

Jord.

[giskard]

Whoohooooooo!!!!!

Giskard just slipped in at position 99
Not too shabby at just under 2065 hrs.

Hubba Hubba

Giskard.

[Jorden]

<font size=5>******GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR******</font>



Look who you just dropped down again, Giskard Now, be nice....

Jord.

[giskard]

[Dyre]

Playing Diablo2 non stop isnt going to get me back on the list...
My pIII 450@600 would put me in the top 20 easy.... if i could just stop playing diablo2.

[Sir Hitech]

giskard: Welcome to the 100 club. Congratuations!

Dyre: Same here! Diablo II ought to be banned from Team Seti@MURC.. Gotta admit that the game is damn addicting despite the SUCKY graphics.

[Rattledagger]

Jorden, since ver. 3 have new science, seti@home has stated that all must upgrade to this version then it's released. Older versions can after a transition-period not get new wu/upload results.

The only non-force-upgrade to ver. 3 is if you stop running seti@home

[giskard]

Thanks Sir Hitech. I'm only hanging there by the skin of my teeth. I'll try to bash a few WU's up tonight to cement the position a bit.
Can't have Jorden kicking my butt

Cheers,

Giskard

P.S. Is Diablo II really such a cool game? Never played the original, so i have no idea what it's about. Is it worth buying and does it run well on the G400?