Come get your 2.70 GUI beta RIGHT HERE

[DentyCracker]

I just uninstalled GUI 2.70 off my work machine (an iPAQ P!!! 500 with 128 MB RAM) times were horrible beyond belief. May try it when I get Duron and ASUS A7V next week.
I ordered the ABIT KT7 instead, with a Duron 700

[This message has been edited by DentyCracker (edited 26 August 2000).]

[Guru]

Hey Ratteldagger remember this? http://forums.murc.ws/ubb/Forum12/HTML/000146.html

------------------
PIII450@558, ABIT BX6-2, 256RAM, G400MAX, SBLIVE, HOTROD-UDMA66
Join the MURC SETI team!

[Rattledagger]

Guru, thanks for pointing it out, since I accidently deleted the cmd-2.04-results some time ago on this machine, and haven't saved new ones. It's impossible to compare results then you don't remember that you shall compare to.

But a couple of things in this post stands out: "The 2.70-version on the other hand seems to be fast, maybe even faster than cmd-2.04" This seems to hold true on this machine, but on my dual-p2-333 I got the opposite result.
"But I've got one unit, running to 11h2m" With a couple more wu with high results, I of course upgraded to 2.71 then possible.
"...but since dual-cpu-machine it's not directly comparable." You can't come away from the fact that 7,5h/2wu is more productive than 6,5h/wu, and cmd-2.04 is better to use than beta-2.70

I will not get a real comparing between the versions before cmd-3 is out. To compare the different betas, I must effectually stop crunching for a couple of days, running every version alone.

[Guru]

------------------
Join the MURC SETI team! | SETI @ MURC