Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Setting system priority

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Andrew, "bad arg: -runnormal"
    "bad arg: -runhigh"
    BTW, aren't you quoting something for setidriver now?

    Paul, maybe you can find something, but running as service is still faster than batch-caching. Besides, changing the priority should have negligible effect on otherwise idle machine.

    Comment


    • #17
      Get SETICache's replacement - SETIDriver...
      It controls how many units are "Cached", how many client's can run, transmits results in background, allows you to set priority - Low, Normal, High.... Works very well....

      Now watch and someone will tell me that this program steals every 3rd unit or somesuch...

      That's what I get for dropping out for a 6 month hiatus...

      Guyv

      Back in the saddle with a PIII-650, PIII-850, and a friend using his PIII-700. Soon to add a PIII-800 to the mix.

      Gaming Rig.

      - Gigabyte GA-7N400-Pro
      - AMD Athlon 3200+ XP
      - 1.5GB Dual Channel DDR 433Mhz SDRAM
      - 6.1 Digital Audio
      - Gigabit Lan (Linksys 1032)
      - 4 x 120GB SATA Drives, RAID 0+1 (Striped/Mirrored)
      - Sony DRU-500A DVD/+/-/R/RW
      - Creative 8x DVD-ROM
      - LS120 IDE Floppy
      - Zip 100 IDE
      - PNY Ultra 5900 (256MB)
      - NEC FE950
      - DTT2500 Cambridge Soundworks

      Comment


      • #18
        Damn, I've really got to start testing these bloody suggestions . Just use setidriver and it'll let you set the priority. It's easier than messing with batch files too.

        ------------------
        Andrew

        I will not torment the emotionally frail
        Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox

        Comment

        Working...
        X