Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Big result files ! ! !

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Big result files ! ! !

    The result.sah files are getting bigger with 3.0 I know that.

    But why have they removed the file size limit? (or increased it beyond reason)

    My new file size record is 5.57 MB up from my previous record of 1.90 MB.

    Is this maybe the reason the server wont give me credit for this WU? Any ideas?
    The effort summary returned was 30 WU old. Is there DB getting corrupted, AGAIN ?

    I have a backup of this WU so I may try again!

    Daniel

  • #2
    UPDATE

    I tried to send the same WU ones more and I got a summary 29 WU's old.

    My account summary @ berkeley doesn't seem to be wrong, yet, though.

    Daniel

    Comment


    • #3
      5MB result.sah?!

      I've got 19 waiting to go up and the largest is 6.4KB - am I missing something here?

      Paul.

      Meet Jasmine.
      flickr.com/photos/pace3000

      Comment


      • #4
        Exactly that client is you using getting this very large result-file?
        That OS is you running on?
        Is you overclocking?

        AFAIK if you don't use one of the buggy beta-clients, the max size should be 64k for the result-file. My largest is 49k before I got an error, and largest non-error is 25k.

        If you've still got a backup of the wu, you can zip it & e-mail this to me, and I can try it on a couple of clients. I don't need your result-file.
        Address is rattledagger@bergen.online.no

        Comment


        • #5
          BTW Rattledagger have you tried 3.03 yet?

          ------------------
          Join the MURC SETI team! | SETI @ MURC

          Bad dog. BAD DOG! I SAID BAD DOG!!! Go HUMP SOMEONE ELSES LEG GODDAMNIT!!!
          According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless...

          Comment


          • #6
            Thanks for your replies.

            I'm using the i386-winnt-cmdline 3.0

            I believe it may be the result of a defective memory module, I had some lockups but replacing the module seems to have cured the problem.

            And with the new module I now run ,my P!!!650@930 MHz and CAS 2-2-2 (R7-1-1-1 W5-1-1-1)
            AOpen AC6BC
            2* 128 MB PC133 CAS 2
            G400 MAX
            SBLive!
            Promise Ultra100 - IBM 13 + 46 GB
            3COM 905C-TX-M
            CD-ROM, DVD, CDRW


            Daniel

            Comment


            • #7
              test
              P5B Deluxe, C2D E6600, Scythe Ninja, G.Skill 2GBHX
              Raptor 150x3, Plextor PX-760SA, X-Fi Elite, 7900GT, 21" CM813ET Plus, CM Stacker

              Comment


              • #8
                Mr D. Ackerot

                650 @ 930 ,wow! ,I can't wait to see what my S1 PIII 650 (cBo stepping) will overclock to.(waiting for the hsf).
                BTW what hsf are you using on it?

                ------------------
                I guess I won't recruit for my team here Team Anandtech
                Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, Asteroids@H, LHC@H, Skynet POGS.

                Main rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 5850 (Cat 13.1), 4GB DDR2, Win 7 64bit, BOINC 7.2.42
                2nd rig - E5200 @3.73 GHz, GTX 260 c216, 4GB DDR2, Win XP, BOINC 7.2.42

                Comment


                • #9

                  Assimilator1:

                  I'm Using a Alpha P3125 it's a slot version cBo stepping, don't have plant and week available now, running fine up to 962 but then I must run my ram at CAS 333 and use a PCI based Matrox Mystic because I am running a AOpen AX6BC (BX based) and using AGP 2X, no extra voltage...

                  Clocked down a bit to 900 now to get my favourite game to be stable

                  Daniel

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X