Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Interesting post in alt.comp.hardware.oc group

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Interesting post in alt.comp.hardware.oc group

    I did not write the below message and post it here because it is interesting.

    ---------------------------------------------

    A message was posted to alt.sci.seti pointing to an article in "Wired"
    magazine http://www.wired.com/news/technology...,41838,00.html .

    The poster included these quotes from the article:

    "Cheating to be top ET searcher on Seti@home may be more widespread than
    previously believed."

    and

    David Anderson (the director of SETI@home) as saying "Fifty percent of the
    project's
    resources have been spent dealing with security problems"

    Well, I read the article, then checked some facts, and posted this reply:

    Sounds like a quote from someone trying to protect his turf, a projected
    commercial distributed computing enterprise. Here's another line from the
    article:
    "As well as heading up Seti@home, Anderson is the CTO of United Devices, a
    startup planning to turn a profit from distributed computing."

    If you go to the United Devices page
    http://www.uniteddevices.com/about/management.htm there's Anderson.

    I think I am going to beef up MY security to make sure United Devices does
    not slip in a few for-profit work units. In fact, the whole idea is so
    damaging to SETI@home, Anderson should either be severed or SETI@home will
    lose all credibility, not from the outside, but from within.

    There has definitely been a lack of full disclosure, and in my opinion,
    Anderson shows the ethics of a round worm. His lack of honesty places him
    several rungs lower than "Ollie" and the recent fakers. It is also
    disappointing that the members of the SETI@home team who have put in so much
    work on the project and posted so often to this newsgroup have participated
    in the cover-up. UCB's reputation is tarred with the same brush.

    "It's the economy, stupid, not the science." So it was competition first,
    all along. We were just naive to believe that it was the little guys who
    were putting science second. I wonder how the sponsors feel about their
    contributions to a start-up company? Let's see; there's

    The Planetary Society at http://www.planetary.org/

    The University of California Digital Media Innovation Program at
    http://www.dimi.ucsb.edu/

    Sun Microsystems at http://www.sun.com/

    Friends of SETI@home at http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/donor.html

    Paramount Pictures at http://www.paramount.com/

    FujiFilm Computer Products at http://www.fujifilmmediasource.com/

    IBM Developer Works at http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/

    Quantum Corporation at http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/

    Critical Path at http://www.cp.net/

    The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. at http://www.cp.net/

    Informix at http://www.informix.com/

    space.com at http://www.space.com/

    Intel at http://www.intel.com/

    Crystal Group, Inc. at http://www.intel.com/

    Engineering Design Team at http://www.edt.com/

    O'Reilly & Associates at http://www.oreilly.com/

    The Seti Institute at http://www.seti-inst.edu/

    MemEcom, now Totality at http://www.totality.com/1024Flash/home.html

    Polycom at http://www.polycom.com/

    DLH Industries, Inc. at http://www.dlh-inc.com/

    Space Sounds at http://216.156.129.123/ .

    Phil Weldon, pweldon@mindspring.com
    Tyan Thunder K7, 768MB Registered DDR ECC, 2xMP2200+, Radeon 9700 Pro, Adaptec 2940U2B Ultra2 SCSI, TB Santa Cruz, Pyro 1394DV. RAID 0 stripe set on hacked Promise UltraTX2 with dual WD 120MB SE drives. HP DVD200i DVD+RW drive.

  • #2
    Well, I will not crunch any more wu's for Seti nor for any distributed computing projects. I have better uses for my machines and additional electricity I had to pay. Let them go buy their computers and crunch themselves. I am just so sick to my stomach with all the recent cheating, slow wu time and profit-driven shit going on. I also feel sorry for education institue like UCBerkeley who got rode.

    NO MORE!

    Comment


    • #3
      Before jumping to conclusions, I'd like to point out these posts in alt.sci.seti.

      Sorry, it's a crappy link, you'll have to scroll a bit.

      Read the posts from Eric J. Korpela (one of the S@H team members).

      Martin

      Comment


      • #4
        Perhaps I have make my decision solely based on opinions not the real facts. Eric has a lot of credibility with the people who frequent the Seti newsgroup as he's always the first(or the only one) from Seti to offer explanation to any technical issues. I can trust his personal assurance. However, if Anderson has been a senior advisor instead of director then I wouldn't have some much problem with it. Its an issue of ethics. Seti@home does not need another ripple to add to its recent waves of controversies.

        I shall crunch on....for Seti@MURC.

        Comment

        Working...
        X