Genome@MURC storms into 9th place!

[Mark F]

Well this getting to be fun again.

Another machine will run out of cached WU for S@H in about 3/4 hour and will go over to G@H. Watch out Martin .

If the clowns (oops...sorry I meant Techs) don't get the S@H servers wired by tomorrow and they are out for the weekend we may have a shakeup on the top 5 spots, lets give 'em hell Martin and RMX. Weeeeeeee.

With a weekend of gains like we have made the last few days and a few more crunchers from S@H that need something to do WE could even make 7th or 8th place. Take that OcUK!!

yeah the old competitive spirt is back!!!

Any chance of a page like seti.matroxusers.com for G@H???

Go MURCers

Mark F.

------------------
OH NO, my retractable cup holder swallowed a DVD...
and burped out a movie

[TomNuttall]

We are already in 8th place

Tom

[Mark F]

Ummmm. OK...

7th or even 6th. Is that better?

Picky, picky...

Well, any way, hope everyone got the idea; even if I can't keep my numbers striate :O

(Yeah I know one of the embarased faces is wrong, but it's late and I can't remember all the emoticons that work. Lack of sleep and an abundance of Vodka will do that.)

Good night,
Mark F.

------------------
OH NO, my retractable cup holder swallowed a DVD...
and burped out a movie

[Mark F]

Bummer, the cheaks don't become flushed anymore.

Anyway, one more S@H cache is empty. Go G@H go.

Mark F.

------------------
OH NO, my retractable cup holder swallowed a DVD...
and burped out a movie

[-=Narcissus=-]

Whoa! Getting pretty close to second spot there... Unfortunately, I'm first right now...

Ok you stat hungry crunchers, I've logged a couple total WUs from the past day or so to check out the difference between OcUK and us.
So here it is, in a non-linear fashion starting at about 14:00 GMT yesterday.

2091.97
2087.39
2163.45
2150.59
2219.07
//Fred sleeps... zZzZzZz ...Stats missing
1977.43 (!)

Not bad at all, thanks to all you guys, notably those giving us a hand while S@H is down!

The best thing is that we're gonna catch MedCath before OcUK, so that's 2 spots!

Fred



[This message has been edited by -=Narcissus=- (edited 02 March 2001).]

[Jorden]

Okay, so I just downloaded Genome, joined G@Murc and it's now crunching 98 'things'...

Errm, I cannot close down inbetween? And how do I see how much I have, in what file?

Pretty confused Jord

[-=Narcissus=-]

Hi Jorden, welocme!

First of all 98 'things' is your amino acid length, which tells you how large your protein is. The bigger the protein, the longer it takes to compute. But you get more wus to show for your hard work. In your case, you've got one of the longest proteins (45hrs on my C466) but you'll get a little under 30wus for your effort.

You can close down in between, but if you might lose some processing time. You've probably seen the Desinging protein sequence xx/30 message on your screen. Those are the intermediate steps that are saved. Inside every one of those intermediates, you'l have a progress indication (%). This is the work that you might loose. Just make sure that you're not at 80 or 90% of an intermediate when you shut the program down and you'll be ok.
One more thing, if you shut the program down before finishing the first intermediate (1/30), g@h will scrap this work unit and go get a new one the next time you start the client.

You can also seen the progress in the output.seq file. It saves all the intermediate steps with some stuff that I don't understand.

Fred

[TomNuttall]

Sorry Mark, I didn't mean to make you blush
I just thought you might like to know.

Actually, you are right, the old competetive spirit IS back. It's fun again.

I might just stay with G&H and crunch a few units on my main machine (1 ghz tbird), and let my p3650 do the seti.

Or maybe both G&H??

Tom

[TomNuttall]

Version 0.93 ready for download

Tom

[Guyver]

OK, Now am I first?

[-=Narcissus=-]

Nice going Guyver, you finally cought me (us)!

Oh well, production should ramp in a few days, so enjoy being first while you can!

Fred

[Jorden]

Okay, I got 12 subloops ready (of the 30), but I found out that it quits after every 6 subloops. Is this normal behaviour of Genome?

Jord.

[Liquid Snake]

No, that is not normal behavior. Someone else here mentioned a similar problem happening. I don't know of a solution though, I'm new to Genome too Did you try the new client version 0.93?

[Jorden]

It happened in 0.91, so I d/led and use 0.93 now to check.

Jord.

[-=Narcissus=-]

Indeed, not normal behaviour at all.

Guyver posted a little "how to not let this problem ruin your day" batch file here.

Please keep us informed about if v0.93 solved this problem.

Fred