Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GENOME stats correcting coming 26. October!!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GENOME stats correcting coming 26. October!!!!!

    For full post, goto http://groups.yahoo.com/group/genomeathome/message/3418

    For feedback & suggestions, use the same group.

    For a probably result after the stats-corrections for us, look at http://gah.stanford.edu/teams2/MatroxUsers.html.

    Now, there's atleast some bugs here, since some users has returned many genes, but hasn't got any wu-credits, and summing the wu gives 335k, but on the top we've got 601k.

    But in any case, it looks like some will lose many wu.

  • #2
    If it makes me number 13 in a weeks time, I'll be okay with it
    Jordâ„¢

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Jorden
      If it makes me number 13 in a weeks time, I'll be okay with it


      Doesn't you fall down to #32 now? If you're talking about top genome-cruncher, I'll not produce a new list before November.

      Comment


      • #4
        Phew!
        I'm listed at 904 in the new stats, don't even make the top 1000 in the old

        breezer
        Everything I say is true apart from that which is not

        Comment


        • #5
          what? 50% lost??!

          ok, I am always using the latest client, had a max. of 3 or 4 duplicate genes (moving clients around after formating etc...)

          so wtf is going on???

          mfg
          wulfman
          "Perhaps they communicate by changing colour? Like those sea creatures .."
          "Lobsters?"
          "Really? I didn't know they did that."
          "Oh yes, red means help!"

          Comment


          • #6
            Aarghh!! I have lost about 3 thousand points.

            I have done NO copying of files onto new machines, just straight crunching.



            It must have been the -nonet that did it

            Tom

            Comment


            • #7
              Damn I'm going to lose almost 10,000 WUs!!! But then Nordlichter will lose almost all of their WUs and we'll be back to #7

              I didn't do too much noneting. I did some, but I don't think it would've been enough for me to lose almost 10,000 WUs!!

              Comment


              • #8
                Team_DGC is loosing 3k and I dont understand why????? Someone please explain to me what is going on here!
                According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Liquid Snake, the wu's reported in the previous link is really screwed up. Atleast for now, the correct is to compare top 1000 users:
                  http://gah.stanford.edu/userstats.html with the new:

                  From these, you're losing around 1300 wu.

                  Guru, it looks like all results is calculated using a new wu-formula, and this formula leads to a 5% hit. Atleast this will probably be fixed. At the same time, wu done with the linear wu-formula will get a bigger hit.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Looks like I'll lose about 4000 wu's, 'bout the same as box
                    I didn't know nonetting was a bad thing. If we are going to lose wu's because of it why is the option their?
                    I have no choice but to nonet, if I didn't my home phone would be constantly busy with 7 machines running. So if I lose wu's because I nonet looks like I might just have to give-up D/C projects and sell some machines. It's not what I want to do but... Or am I misunderstanding the corrections and how nonet affects the way stats are going to be done?
                    Pete
                    Last edited by rocketmanx; 18 October 2001, 21:36.

                    Comment


                    • #11

                      I've just upped my output and find i've lost the units

                      • old 870 breezer 6058.17
                        new 830 breezer 5665.72



                      breezer
                      Everything I say is true apart from that which is not

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        LOL RD, I was in the top1000 around 983, so I haven't got a clue where I went, but I still retain some 5125 points.

                        Too low to be in the top 1000

                        Jord.
                        Jordâ„¢

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          No problem here, as I am running SETI and not GeNome.
                          Thank you.
                          What the hell are we doing in the middle of the desert?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Oh, only 1300, that's not that bad. Wow Hoppe lost more than 600,000 WUs!!!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              As for Hoppe, because of large production he have got some friends helping him with uploading, but he forgot to include all 3 result-files... (result.#####, csum.##### and str.#####)

                              Jorden, since you're not in top1000, you've got below 4500...

                              rocketmanx, didn't you lose nearly 7k?

                              A quick and dirty table of top losers, from 17. October, 18PDT. Note, since it's only top1000 that works, persons that aren't on both isn't counted...:

                              Ant; 30,4%; 3,3k
                              Ees; 18,2%; 2,5k
                              Narcissus; 17,9%; 1,5k
                              winwiz; 17,4%; 1,4k
                              Pace; 16,7%; 1,2k
                              cbman; 13,4%; 1,0k
                              CHHAS; 12,5%; 719
                              Manex; 11,6%; 1,0k
                              TomNuttall; 11,4%; 3,0k
                              rocketmanx; 10,6%; 6,8k
                              guyver; 10,1%; 6,0k
                              lurqa; 9,2%; 1,2k
                              DentyCracker; 9,1%; 2,3k
                              LittleGreenMartians; 8,5%; 2,2k
                              Spazm; 8,2%; 738
                              MarkF001; 8,0%; 2,5k
                              Team_DGC; 7,9%; 3,6k
                              LiquidSnake; 7,3%; 1,3k
                              Acke; 7,2%; 675
                              k1l; 7,1%; 949
                              Sisyfos; 6,4%; 3,4k
                              breezer; 6,1%; 318
                              stardock; 5,8%; 911
                              box; 5,4%; 3,8k
                              Hecubus; 5,2%; 1,4k
                              Buskov; 4,6%; 260

                              Hoppe; 95,97%; 629,4k .....

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X