Gurm,
You know, I think I have read about the "teleportation" experiment somewhere else years ago in Scientific American (when I was still an active subscriber in college). The article was a little conservative though (if I recall correctly), just like your reply.
Thanks for the "enlightenment".
<hr>
Paddy[MU],
I think quantum entangled photons are more applicable to mirroring energy/mass. Transferring energy/mass a la Star Trek's "transporter beam" isn't something the experiment is implying.
<hr>
As for the Boomerang experiment, I personally feel that a flat (or nearly flat) universe is a GOOD thing. It doesn't mess with good old Euclidean stuff. Parallel lines remain parallel forever (hmm.. no singularities then?). And like Paddy[MU] said, it is good news for the universe as we <u>probably</u> will not head for a big crunch (the opposite of a big bang).
------------------
JamesA: Just a Dumbass MURCer
System Details
"Have you had any licorice lately?"
You know, I think I have read about the "teleportation" experiment somewhere else years ago in Scientific American (when I was still an active subscriber in college). The article was a little conservative though (if I recall correctly), just like your reply.
Thanks for the "enlightenment".
<hr>
Paddy[MU],
I think quantum entangled photons are more applicable to mirroring energy/mass. Transferring energy/mass a la Star Trek's "transporter beam" isn't something the experiment is implying.
<hr>
As for the Boomerang experiment, I personally feel that a flat (or nearly flat) universe is a GOOD thing. It doesn't mess with good old Euclidean stuff. Parallel lines remain parallel forever (hmm.. no singularities then?). And like Paddy[MU] said, it is good news for the universe as we <u>probably</u> will not head for a big crunch (the opposite of a big bang).
------------------
JamesA: Just a Dumbass MURCer
System Details
"Have you had any licorice lately?"
Comment