Perhaps this should be in the general hw/sw forum, but it is more of a rant than anything useful so I'll post it in tsb.
Microsoft has selected to use Ravisent's soft-DVD software for the X box. See the article for more info http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1006-200...e.1002.bgif.ni
On the suface that seems OK. Over the months they have made various announcements as to who is going to be providing cpus, video, ram, hds, etc, for the X box. Ravisent is the same company that provides the Matrox G400 prebundled soft-DVD decoding, and it does a good job IMHO.
But what strikes me as odd is that Microsoft is primarily a software company. Why in the world do they need to get a third party company to provide the software for DVD playback? Are they admitting incompetence in this area? This is the same company that provides Windows Media Player 7, so I would think that they at least have a clue regarding decoding an mpeg stream into audio & video. What gives?
Microsoft has selected to use Ravisent's soft-DVD software for the X box. See the article for more info http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1006-200...e.1002.bgif.ni
On the suface that seems OK. Over the months they have made various announcements as to who is going to be providing cpus, video, ram, hds, etc, for the X box. Ravisent is the same company that provides the Matrox G400 prebundled soft-DVD decoding, and it does a good job IMHO.
But what strikes me as odd is that Microsoft is primarily a software company. Why in the world do they need to get a third party company to provide the software for DVD playback? Are they admitting incompetence in this area? This is the same company that provides Windows Media Player 7, so I would think that they at least have a clue regarding decoding an mpeg stream into audio & video. What gives?
Comment