If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
DFI NFIIUltra 400
756Ram ATI 9550 256mem
Lite-On DVDR/RW/DL
Windows XP pro
msn messenger id: gchisel
Be aware that a halo has to fall only a few inches to be a noose
A Moral Question... I have a moral question for you. Think carefully before
you decide.
This is an imaginary situation, but I think it is interesting to decide what
one would do. The situation: You are in the Middle East, and there is a huge
flood in progress. Many homes have been lost, water supplies compromised and
structures destroyed.
Let's say that you're a photographer and getting still photos for a news
service, traveling alone, looking for particularly poignant scenes. You come
across Osama Bin Laden who has been swept away by the floodwaters. He is
barely hanging on to a tree limb and is about to go under. You can either put
down your camera and save him, or take a Pulitzer Prize winning photograph of
him as he loses his grip on the limb.
So, here's the question and think carefully before you answer the question
below:
Which lens and shutter speed would you use?
Joel
Libertarian is still the way to go if we truly want a real change.
I would save his life.. so he would be lying there half drowned and incapable of fighting back when I tie him up and take him to a secure location where I torture him mercilessly and then take a picture of his battered carcass a year later while he barely clings to life and win the pulitzer.
Comment