If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
Yeah, isn't he the guy who invented the car that runs on water, too?
- Gurm
The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!
I'm the least you could do
If only life were as easy as you
I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
If only life were as easy as you
I would still get screwed
If by that you mean the keely motor, then yes. I think that guy just had bad luck: he was much earlier than he was supposed to be, most of his ideas were stolen by other scientists (hello Tesla whatchu got there?) or misuderstood and frowned upon.
Anyways, it makes for some really interesting reading nowadays, when the science is finally catching on and beginning to understand the processes that made his inventions work (which was 120 years ago btw...). I sure hope one day we will be able to recreate some of his inventions.
the above link goes to a page with this thext at the top:
Earning $100,000 a year is just as easy as earning $15,000 when you know how!
Over 7 million doing it now!
Create Your Own Six Figure Income!
Typical spam lines....
If the autor wants anyone to take it serious he should not have included that!
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
It can be argued that this process is actually an instantaneous acceleration of the elementary particulate constructs of the molecular substance under investigation. Within the conventional Theory of Relativity it is shown that the faster an object moves the denser it gets. The denser something gets the smaller it becomes and the more energy it contains and/or releases.
Is that right? It seems to my physics memory that this is just poor understanding, science BS, or bad writing. Am I wrong, or does this guy not make sense?
MadScot
Asus P2B-LS, Celeron Tualatin 1.3Ghz (PowerLeap adapter), 256Mb PC100 CAS 2, Matrox Millenium G400 DualHead AGP, RainbowRunner G-series, Creative PC-DVD Dxr2, HP CD-RW 9200i, Quantum V 9Gb SCSI HD, Maxtor 20Gb Ultra-66 HD (52049U4), Soundblaster Audigy, ViewSonic PS790 19", Win2k (SP2)
I thought as much. Not that I thought it was true, but rather I wondered how far off they could be while trying to be serious. I guess people believe anything!
MadScot
Asus P2B-LS, Celeron Tualatin 1.3Ghz (PowerLeap adapter), 256Mb PC100 CAS 2, Matrox Millenium G400 DualHead AGP, RainbowRunner G-series, Creative PC-DVD Dxr2, HP CD-RW 9200i, Quantum V 9Gb SCSI HD, Maxtor 20Gb Ultra-66 HD (52049U4), Soundblaster Audigy, ViewSonic PS790 19", Win2k (SP2)
I have read a loot of the site now and I don’t like the feeling I get.
Something with it makes my stomach turn in the same way as when I was reading the Watchtower (Jehovah’s witnesses’ magazine) on how blood transfusions was evil
If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.
Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."
Comment