Which are worse ?

[Dogbert]

Which are worse, people who seek to destroy others or self destructive people ?

I vote for the self destructive ones. Why ? Cause mostly they either take others with them (which makes them as bad as those who seek to destroy others) and sice many times someone is counting on them and they let him down.

[Admiral]

I guess this is in response to the Jerusalem bus bombing ?

I also voted for 2, though those people will get their spiritual punishment faster than the non suicide ones.

edit: then again the worst ones are those who indoctrinate the second to do so

[Strahd]

Those who seek to destroy others as they get the chance to do it repeatedly.

[ZokesPro]

Why do you need to know this?

[Strahd]

Probably because he lives in Israel and he lives with that shit everyday.

[Sethos]

Really this is a question wherein there is no correct answer, should you choose between those options. Personaly I feel to be correct you must say that both are bad. Who's to judge what's worse when both are bad, bad is bad...Black and White, understand? of course that's just one of several view points...

~Sethos

[thop]

Why do you need to know this?

[ZokesPro]

Originally posted by Strahd
Probably because he lives in Israel and he lives with that shit everyday.

If he does, than I can understand why he's posting this, but otherwise my answer would be "neither". (they are both bad)

Thop: Why the thumbs up?

[Dogbert]

Why, because in many debates here I see two extreme sides.
Those who hate the 'enemy' and are ready to destroy him and the people with/behind him. And on the other side, those who know about the other sides's murderous intentions yet for some reason vote against desrtoying him, while weakening their own side thus making it vulnerable for destruction.

For example, the French being always pro-Arab, by so weakening NATO and (stupidly) hurrying their own distruction by the same forces which they protect.

[thop]

i misread it as why do WE need to know this still

[ZokesPro]

Originally posted by Dogbert
Why, because in many debates here I see two extreme sides.
Those who hate the 'enemy' and are ready to destroy him and the people with/behind him. And on the other side, those who know about the other sides's murderous intentions yet for some reason vote against desrtoying him, while weakening their own side thus making it vulnerable for destruction.

For example, the French being always pro-Arab, by so weakening NATO and (stupidly) hurrying their own distruction by the same forces which they protect.

I see, well I generally stay out of those discussions.

[Byock]

Originally posted by ZokesPro


I see, well I generally stay out of those discussions.

You? Stay out of a discussion?? Buwahahahaha!

(j/k)

Had to be said....

(teach you to use BBQ sauce )