Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No defrag needed!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    oh, why does the XP defragmenter not do it's job as it should? it's way faster then the old defragmenter, but it usually seems nothing or little has changed when it's done...
    Main Machine: Intel Q6600@3.33, Abit IP-35 E, 4 x Geil 2048MB PC2-6400-CL4, Asus Geforce 8800GTS 512MB@700/2100, 150GB WD Raptor, Highpoint RR2640, 3x Seagate LP 1.5TB (RAID5), NEC-3500 DVD+/-R(W), Antec SLK3700BQE case, BeQuiet! DarkPower Pro 530W

    Comment


    • #17
      Because it doesn't consolidate freespace like the Win9x one did.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Jon P. Inghram
        Because it doesn't consolidate freespace like the Win9x one did.
        and that will save you time if nothing will
        Wikipedia and Google.... the needles to my tangent habit.
        ________________________________________________

        That special feeling we get in the cockles of our hearts, Or maybe below the cockles, Maybe in the sub-cockle area, Maybe in the liver, Maybe in the kidneys, Maybe even in the colon, We don't know.

        Comment

        Working...
        X