Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Radeon 8500, the Matrox card that should have been

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • #16
    It seems to me that Iiyama monitors have the best bang for the buck, but many members of the fori has got cornerstone monitors and they seem to be very happy with them.

    I have a Iiyama VM pro 451 and I am very happy.

    Comment

    • #17
      I have a Conerstone 1025c which was their lower end business model, which they don't carry anymore because of price drops in their professional models, and it is a very good monitor.

      Joel
      Libertarian is still the way to go if we truly want a real change.

      www.lp.org

      ******************************

      System Specs: AMD XP2000+ @1.68GHz(12.5x133), ASUS A7V133-C, 512MB PC133, Matrox Parhelia 128MB, SB Live! 5.1.
      OS: Windows XP Pro.
      Monitor: Cornerstone c1025 @ 1280x960 @85Hz.

      Comment

      • #18
        This thread has been moved to General Hardware/Software

        Comment

        • #19
          why on earth did you move this thread? that was silly. i started it with the premise of speculating how it should have been matrox's next card. SPECULATING. sounds to me like it should be here...
          First Love:
          • Lite-On FS020 enclosure w/4 120mm Panaflos and soon a 172mm Nidec
          • MSI 694D Pro w/ BIOS 1.6
          • 2x800E cC0 Pentium 3 w/ 2xVolcanoII
          • SyncMAX(NEC) PC166 VCM SDRAM 4x128mb w/ CAS = 1
          • nVidia Quadro2 Pro, but Matrox at heart
          • And other non-important stuff like hard drives and a dvd drive
          • Pineapples


          Second Love:
          1990 Toyota Celica GT

          Comment

          • #20
            No one has moved the thread. He's not a moderator and has no means to do so.

            Rags

            Comment

            • #21


              sorry, didnt mean to scare anyone, i was just kidding, because i noticed that people were talking about monitors, and not matrox future products, maybe i should have made that clear with adding a wink or two, oops

              No offense meant to anyone

              edit: i made a really embarrasing spelling mistake ("too" instead of "two" and fixed it )
              Last edited by Topha; 19 August 2001, 11:30.

              Comment

              • #22
                I did read once that Ramdacs are important for more than just pushing refresh rates..

                Something with half the frequency setting equals a "max" possible quality. So a high ramdac isnt the same as a high quality, but it allows a high quality..

                Pls feel free to correct me. Its been more than a year since I read that article..

                ~~DukeP~~

                => Oh and if people are on a tight budget, deksspace wise, i highly recommend the Samsung Syncmaster 900sl+ Its a short neck version - its more shallow than my antiquated 17". Nice high refreshrates, clear and bright pictures, flat screen. And a rather big 19" at that.
                Last edited by DukeP; 19 August 2001, 15:41.

                Comment

                • #23
                  Originally posted by Guru
                  Nice to see I'm not the only Toyota fan around here!
                  \o_ ---> Here's one too. eventhough I like even more 1968-1975 Mini Cooper S'es
                  "Dippadai"

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Nappe1
                    ... I like even more 1968-1975 Mini Cooper S'es
                    Well then you might want to plop down your deposit for a brand new one from BMW.
                    <TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>

                    Comment

                    Previous 1 2 template Next
                    Working...
                    X