Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Parhelia Benchmark

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Parhelia Benchmark

    Radeon technical support forum for all Radeon products from the classic Radeon to the latest cutting edge family of graphics cards.



  • #2
    well.. with beta drivers... wich look far from finished to me if I look at the results...

    let's wait for REAL benchmarks!

    Comment


    • #3
      According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless...

      Comment


      • #4
        those are the old benchmarks from maximumPc.
        This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.

        Comment


        • #5
          we don't need to see that idiot hellbinders post he is fool and always bashes matrox

          Comment


          • #6
            Let him eat his hat.
            System Specs:
            Gigabyte 8INXP - Pentium 4 2.8@3.4 - 1GB Corsair 3200 XMS - Enermax 550W PSU - 2 80GB WDs 8MB cache in RAID 0 array - 36GB Seagate 15.3K SCSI boot drive - ATI AIW 9700 - M-Audio Revolution - 16x Pioneer DVD slot load - Lite-On 48x24x48x CD-RW - Logitech MX700 - Koolance PC2-601BW case - Cambridge MegaWorks 550s - Mitsubishi 2070SB 22" CRT

            Our Father, who 0wnz heaven, j00 r0ck!
            May all 0ur base someday be belong to you!
            Give us this day our warez, mp3z, and pr0n through a phat pipe.
            And cut us some slack when we act like n00b lamerz,
            just as we teach n00bz when they act lame on us.
            For j00 0wn r00t on all our b0x3s 4ever and ever, 4m3n.

            Comment


            • #7
              Still those results really do concern me. I have no problem to get better results with my Radeon8500 (on a worse CPU), even the Radeons 4x Quality FSAA results are higher than the Parhelia FAA 16x ones.
              And the 4x quality FSAA on the R8500 is just too slow to be of much use in newer games, so that means if those Parhelia drivers are not really early alpha ones, that the 16x FAA won't cut it.
              But we named the *dog* Indiana...
              My System
              2nd System (not for Windows lovers )
              German ATI-forum

              Comment


              • #8
                I saw those benchmarks in the latest issue of MaximumPC and I just had to laugh my ass off. They even state that they are beta benchmarks on earlier hardware using early drivers and people still take them too seriously.

                If you look around you will see that most of us beta testers are running the Parhelia with 16xFAA always ON and we love it.

                Joel
                Libertarian is still the way to go if we truly want a real change.

                www.lp.org

                ******************************

                System Specs: AMD XP2000+ @1.68GHz(12.5x133), ASUS A7V133-C, 512MB PC133, Matrox Parhelia 128MB, SB Live! 5.1.
                OS: Windows XP Pro.
                Monitor: Cornerstone c1025 @ 1280x960 @85Hz.

                Comment


                • #9
                  If Matrox wanted to shine on the FPS scene they would have done a card that beats all others in 3D Marks and would have published it. What guys on the other forum forget is that card is about to do anything pro guys want it to do. I know a few of them, they will NEVER buy ATI because their driver suck big time (and ATI is not really working on it) nor would they buy nVidia because of their poor quality PLUS their poor driver. Matrox never wanted the FPS crown and will never chase it because they do have what's more important than anything else : professionalism. Go try to ask ATI or nVidia when you a have a problem with a card... well try to get an answer first. I want quality in all degrees, acceptable speed, premium service and alot of features. Obviously I'll go for Matrox. We can't compare apples with peers so lets not compare companies that do not play on the same ground.
                  Let those who want to be simple, be simple.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    3DMarks don't mean shite. The score in that program bears no linear correlation to the Parhelia's performance in QIII-Arena or UT, with or without FAA-16x.

                    Dr. Mordrid
                    Dr. Mordrid
                    ----------------------------
                    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

                    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Why don't we just ignore this people? Wait for the real scores if you really want that pen15 extension
                      Meet Jasmine.
                      flickr.com/photos/pace3000

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        bah I entered this thread looking for a benchmark for Parhelia's like Nvidia's Chameleonmark ...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          It would be blind stupidity to buy a card only based on the sole score of 3DMark. Yet ppl still do it.

                          Those of you who can get dealer prices should check the dealers, some of those are already taking pre-orders. Although they only have bulk version.
                          Let those who want to be simple, be simple.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I'll think I might return the Radeon 8500 and put through my PreOrder...
                            Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Might as well put your pre-order in now. They don't charge until it ships (mine says mid-July), and you're only getting farther back in line.
                              Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X