Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

accuracy vs. precision?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Sethos
    PS. the drunk answer tends to be 11
    But if it's ALWAYS 11 then it's precise. No?
    chuck
    Chuck
    秋音的爸爸

    Comment


    • #17
      yes, somehow.

      reminds me of chemistry (analytical)...

      mfg
      wulfman
      "Perhaps they communicate by changing colour? Like those sea creatures .."
      "Lobsters?"
      "Really? I didn't know they did that."
      "Oh yes, red means help!"

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by cjolley
        But if it's ALWAYS 11 then it's precise. No?
        chuck
        Now you're reaching!

        Comment


        • #19
          Ok, enough examples already!

          Once and for all:

          Precision = repeatability
          Accuracy = correctness

          Now quit it!
          Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox

          Comment


          • #20
            learn this in school before... i think intrepreting this in Math/science will help...

            Accuracy is how close you are to the "right" number/value

            Precision is the "approximation" you work with. i.e. lots of decimals is more precise. It doesn't necessarily has to be accurate.

            For example... in one experiment, the theoretical yield is 12.

            An accurate answer will be 11.

            A precise answer, but not accurate answer is 0.00000000475147181.

            A precise AND accurate answer will be 12.00000000000000001

            An infinitely precise answer is 12. (infinite significant digits)

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by agallag
              Ok, enough examples already!

              Once and for all:

              Precision = repeatability
              Accuracy = correctness

              Now quit it!
              No way man! Gotta do some Postcount++;


              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Chrono_Wanderer
                No way man! Gotta do some Postcount++;


                Ok then... uh... is my postcount 1711, or 1451.938744237475234985?

                Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox

                Comment


                • #23
                  ...and who needs postcount with a userid number of 19? That's right, I r0x0r!! ph34r m3!!!!
                  Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Novdid
                    Now you're reaching!
                    Just pointing out the problem with using repeatability as a definition for precision.

                    Suppose I have two instruments:

                    Gizmo1 can measure a 2x4 to within 1/4".
                    Gizmo2 can measure a 2x4 to within 0.00001".

                    Take a board about 72" long and measure it 3 times with each.

                    Gizmo1 gets: 72", 72", 72"
                    Gizmo 2 gets: 72.00321", 71.98213", 72.00912"

                    You would never say that Gizmo1 was more precise than Gizmo2.

                    Gizmo1 is more consistent than Gizmo2 precisely () because it is less precise!

                    The operative concept is just like significant digits.
                    How finely divided is the ruler.

                    Chuck

                    PS postcount++
                    Chuck
                    秋音的爸爸

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Yeah, what he said...

                      postcount++
                      Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Actually, you WOULD say that Gizmo2 is more precise.

                        - Gurm
                        The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!

                        I'm the least you could do
                        If only life were as easy as you
                        I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
                        If only life were as easy as you
                        I would still get screwed

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I believe that's what Chuck said

                          AZ
                          There's an Opera in my macbook.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Good grief.

                            There are degrees of precision but only one accurate.

                            For example, 3 x 3 = 9... this is accuracy (to an infinite degree of precision)

                            Now, tell me how long this board is.. accurately. You cannot. Why? Well, you are comparing something real and tangible with an accepted standard of measurement.. it is not possible to give a truly accurate answer. Is it a trillion three thousand and two atoms long? Which atoms at what point? At what point in the orbits of those electrons are you measuring? See? Even utterly INCREDIBLE levels of precision will not yield the absolute.. that is, an ACCURATE answer.
                            Last edited by KvHagedorn; 25 April 2003, 18:45.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Happy now Jon?
                              The Welsh support two teams when it comes to rugby. Wales of course, and anyone else playing England

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: accuracy vs. precision?

                                Originally posted by jonnylane
                                I was told that this could be a question in an interview for a job i applied for: What is the difference between accuracy and precision?....
                                Then there is the Monty Python answer.
                                "Do you mean when they are used as nouns or as adverbs?"

                                Chuck
                                Chuck
                                秋音的爸爸

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X