Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would you "waste" a six-pack like this guy did?!
Collapse
X
-
Yeah, not nearly enough alcohol content.Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox
Comment
-
Originally posted by KvHagedorn
I had thought the beverage needed to be at least 50% alcohol (100 proof) to burn.. anyone have personaly experience with this?
Comment
-
The original definition of proof is far more fun
Only the English could invent 'proof' in 1762, which was the technical standard by which strength was measured until 1st January, l980. If gunpowder and alcohol were mixed and the spirit was weaker than proof strength (57% ABV), there was just a damp fizzle. However, when whisky and gunpowder were mixed and there was enough alcohol in the mixture to cause ignition, then the gunpowder flashed, providing the 'proof' of stronger alcohol.
Although these days it is measured by a hydrometer (boring).
Even more boring it's not even quoted as proof, but as ABV
Comment
-
How much alcohol does deoderant have then? I remember turning one stick into a torch not that the plastic casing lasted that long.Last edited by High_Jumbllama; 7 October 2003, 13:57.
Comment
Comment