Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

First hints of commerical FUSION power?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • First hints of commerical FUSION power?

    BBC, News, BBC News, news online, world, uk, international, foreign, british, online, service

  • #2
    Sustainable fusion power is at least 20 years away. And it has been for the last 50 years, and will be for the next 50 years .

    IIRC, this "20 years" is one of the fundamental constants of fusion research.
    DM says: Crunch with Matrox Users@ClimatePrediction.net

    Comment


    • #3
      I didn't know there are actual fusion reactors :?

      Comment


      • #4
        Dunno I do a bit of good fusion the morning after the night before. Just need more beer to keep it going.
        Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
        Weather nut and sad git.

        My Weather Page

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by GNEP
          Sustainable fusion power is at least 20 years away. And it has been for the last 50 years, and will be for the next 50 years .

          IIRC, this "20 years" is one of the fundamental constants of fusion research.
          Could it posible be becuse they are not really getting some few important things?

          Like the fact that they always have to feed twice or trice the amount of energy INTO any of the simulations of any erg of energy they get out?

          the Farnsworth type of reactor have a chance, the "official" magnetic container versions are a waste of energy
          If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.

          Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."

          Comment


          • #6
            The article claims:

            Scientists say the new reactor will be the first such prototype to give out a lot more power than it consumes.

            Comment


            • #7
              Sooner or later we will make a viable fusion reactor. We now it works (look towards the sun) - the rest is just a matter of engineering.

              ~~DukeP~~

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by DukeP
                Sooner or later we will make a viable fusion reactor. We now it works (look towards the sun) - the rest is just a matter of engineering.
                Yeah, yeah, obviously. After all, we all even know that universe works. The rest is just a matter of being a god...
                Sat on a pile of deads, I enjoy my oysters.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Jon P. Inghram
                  The article claims:
                  If they are using the ole Magnetic confinement system and has solved all the problems so qudos to them

                  Anyway, I'll believe it when I see it
                  If there's artificial intelligence, there's bound to be some artificial stupidity.

                  Jeremy Clarkson "806 brake horsepower..and that on that limp wrist faerie liquid the Americans call petrol, if you run it on the more explosive jungle juice we have in Europe you'd be getting 850 brake horsepower..."

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Technoid

                    Anyway, I'll believe it when I see it
                    What kind of an attitude is that?!?

                    I'd be REALLY impressed by a "Mr. Fusion" home fusion device that somehow manages to avoid the inconvience of those pesky neutrons leaking out and giving everyone near it the magic "invisible tan," or perhaps just soaking into the shielding to the point that it needs to be replaced before it becomes fissionable itself.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      IMO magnetic confinement isn't going to be practical because of its power requirements. In contrast Filo T. Farnsworth's FUSOR design, which dates back to the 50's and 60's, was able to get neutron production using 115vac wall current. IF the $$ put into magnetic confinement had been put into it....

                      Dr. Mordrid
                      Dr. Mordrid
                      ----------------------------
                      An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

                      I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by GNEP
                        Sustainable fusion power is at least 20 years away. And it has been for the last 50 years, and will be for the next 50 years .

                        IIRC, this "20 years" is one of the fundamental constants of fusion research.
                        Absolutely. At one time I had a neighbour working in the Plasma lab of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (now a prof. at some Uni in Oz, still researching fusion). I visited his lab many times. About 1964, he said that they were just on the point of having a plasma pinch reacting and he gave me the 20 year figure, then. That was 40 years ago.

                        Anyway, I'll believe it when I see it
                        Again, absolutely, but I'll be long dead by then, anyway. And that goes for ALL the proposed methods.
                        Brian (the devil incarnate)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Well they've got to get cranking on it, because our global supply of fossile fuel is going to be depleted within the next century.
                          Somehow however I'd trust the Japanese more in building it than the French :P

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            "This electricity smells bad!"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by rylan
                              [B]Well they've got to get cranking on it, because our global supply of fossile fuel is going to be depleted within the next century.
                              Oh, I highly doubt that. First off, we've been finding more all the time. Second, we're inventing more efficient engines. Third, we'll probably GM some food plant to make it if petroleum get's <I>that</I> low. And don't forget: The machine that turns anything into fuel.
                              Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X