If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
JPL's got videos up now, it was tumbling very badly. Over on Slashdot someone had an interesting idea: if they used a single axis acceleratometer to trigger the various sequences during reentry the tumbling might have caused it to read incorrectly.
Damn, wherever that speedera.net server is, it's got one hell of a pipe. I just downloaded all 6MB in about 3 seconds. The only glimpse I got of the transfer speed said 3.88MB/sec.
Or else our caching proxy already had a copy of it, but that would be boring.
Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox
Yep, Mars Exploration Rovers, Mars Global Surveyor, 2001 Mars Odyssey, Mars Pathfinder, Magellan, Galileo, Deep Space 1, NEAR Shoemaker, and plenty more recent missions (not counting Cassini-Huygens as it hasn't hit it's mission success requirements yet) have all been "pathetic."
Mars Climate Orbiter was the infamous metric/English goof-up incident.
With Mars Polar Lander/Deep Space 2 they don't really know for certain what happened since by design (to save cost and weight) it didn't transmit any telemetry during entry.
After that disaster they made sure the MER's trasmitted extremely simple telemery during EDL so if something went wrong they'd have at least some data.
The shuttle... yeah, it's pretty hard to defend NASA when they had such a "nothing can possibly go wrong" attitude that when something unusal happened they just ignored it.
Comment