Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Magnetic beams could power swifter spacecraft

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Magnetic beams could power swifter spacecraft

    Focused beams of plasma could rocket astronauts to Mars and back in just 90 days, say space researchers developing the concept for NASA. The idea could mean faster space travel around the solar system.

    Firing a magnetised plasma beam of charged particles - or ions - at a spacecraft equipped with a magnetic sail could propel the craft forward at record speeds, according to Robert Winglee of the University of Washington in Seattle, US. Harnessing the magnetic force of repulsion between the sail and the beam would give the spacecraft its immense thrust.

    The latest science and technology news from New Scientist. Read exclusive articles and expert analysis on breaking stories and global developments

  • #2
    Sounds very interesting, but wouldn't the sun's radiation interfere with it ?
    "For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism."

    Comment


    • #3
      I wonder how they propose to counteract the force the beam expulsion would exert on the sending station at either end.
      Last edited by Brian R.; 19 October 2004, 10:04.

      Comment


      • #4
        Also called MagBeam this is very similar to Mini-Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion (M2P2) with the difference being that the propulsive force is obtained from a man-made beam and not the solar wind.



        MagBeam Propulsion - To Mars And Back In 90 Days re: Larry Niven/Jerry Pournelle on 10/16/2004: Science Fiction in the News


        Dr. Mordrid
        Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 19 October 2004, 11:05.
        Dr. Mordrid
        ----------------------------
        An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

        I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Brian R.
          I wonder how they propose to counteract the force the beam expulsion would exert on the sending station at either end.
          Not sure, but it may be possible to use specific orbits, so the propulsive force from the beam expulsion would counteract the attraction of the planet being orbited by the "driver". (they did mention that there would need to be an "acceleration station" at each end of the trip)

          - Steve

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Brian R.
            I wonder how they propose to counteract the force the beam expulsion would exert on the sending station at either end.
            cant they just use a big anchor?
            The Welsh support two teams when it comes to rugby. Wales of course, and anyone else playing England

            Comment


            • #7
              And what what happen if they missed the end point of the trip? Maybe for cargo.

              Comment


              • #8
                Sounds very exciting!

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think the moon would make a very nice place to loacte the "beam station's".

                  The return journey or deceleration at the end could be tricky as HJ pointed out....It should be useful for "established space routes"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Just imagine if you were off by a tenth of a degree. Then there's the innumerable smaller gravity wells to worry about. When we can map and model the interacting gravity fields of all the many objects in the solar system, solar wind, space dust, etc . . . then maybe this might work with an infinite improbablity drive.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Marshmallowman
                      I think the moon would make a very nice place to loacte the "beam station's".

                      The return journey or deceleration at the end could be tricky as HJ pointed out....It should be useful for "established space routes"
                      Until it rotates or orbits "behind" earth. oops

                      - Steve

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X