I just saw it.
It wasn't as good as spiderman 2, but it was better than daredevil.
I got the feeling that it was meant to be a trilogy because they made a lot of hints about her backstory without going into details. I didn't like that aspect.
Otherwise, the effects were good. The dialog was good. The story was almost-good. It's worth seeing.
I'm sure that the studio idiots blamed Garner for the box office flop, instead of the story. I think that Garner did an adequate job given the material she was given.
They could've made it sexier, but I think they were trying for a PG rating.
It wasn't as good as spiderman 2, but it was better than daredevil.
I got the feeling that it was meant to be a trilogy because they made a lot of hints about her backstory without going into details. I didn't like that aspect.
Otherwise, the effects were good. The dialog was good. The story was almost-good. It's worth seeing.
I'm sure that the studio idiots blamed Garner for the box office flop, instead of the story. I think that Garner did an adequate job given the material she was given.
They could've made it sexier, but I think they were trying for a PG rating.
Comment