A while back I got called for jury duty and had the pleasure of discovering the festering bedsore that is the jury selection process.
I was a potental juror for two cases, one criminal and the other civil. I didn't get on the criminal which was disappointing since the outcome was laughably obvious just from the absurd questions the defense lawyer asked us (and afterwards it became clear the inital reaction was correct: we saw some people from that jury the next day and they had already decided.) As for the civil case, you know it's gonna be a pain the butt when the plaintiff's attorney spends most of their time asking if people have a problem with him because he works for a notorious ambulence chaser, which became rather humorous when one of the potential jurors turns out to be a police officer and that they most assuredly did have a problem with anyone working for that particular law firm. It got to the point that the lawyers started objecting to the others questions to the potental jurors! I got lucky and wasn't picked for that case either, and was dismissed the next day.
The real problem I have with the process is that they pick a group of "random" people and essentally force them to answer whatever questions the attorneys think they can get by with to weed out people they think won't vote their way, and they do it with all the other jurors listening and watching which is a pretty significant invasion of privacy IMHO.
I was a potental juror for two cases, one criminal and the other civil. I didn't get on the criminal which was disappointing since the outcome was laughably obvious just from the absurd questions the defense lawyer asked us (and afterwards it became clear the inital reaction was correct: we saw some people from that jury the next day and they had already decided.) As for the civil case, you know it's gonna be a pain the butt when the plaintiff's attorney spends most of their time asking if people have a problem with him because he works for a notorious ambulence chaser, which became rather humorous when one of the potential jurors turns out to be a police officer and that they most assuredly did have a problem with anyone working for that particular law firm. It got to the point that the lawyers started objecting to the others questions to the potental jurors! I got lucky and wasn't picked for that case either, and was dismissed the next day.
The real problem I have with the process is that they pick a group of "random" people and essentally force them to answer whatever questions the attorneys think they can get by with to weed out people they think won't vote their way, and they do it with all the other jurors listening and watching which is a pretty significant invasion of privacy IMHO.
Comment