Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

About bloomin time!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • About bloomin time!

    FT.

  • #2
    I don't quite understand how the billing would work...roaming charges are different from country to country and if you're on a trans-continental flight you go through quite a few of those Would they adjust the billing on-the-fly depending on where you are at the time? Would that also mean that your voice/GPRS connection would drop when you cross a border? What about when you're flying over an ocean? Who provides the signal for that situation (and in general also, how would a GSM station even work at 10.000m? Does the plane provide the signal?
    All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

    Comment


    • #3
      lecter: the airplane has its own antenna (internally) to host the mobiles, it is considered a network on its own. Users roam from their home network to the airplane's network. So you will be charged for using the plane's network, which most likely won't be cheap. I guess the plane connects via satellite.
      The advantage is that - al all mobiles are connecting to the antenna which is very close by - all mobiles will be transmitting at very low strength (which helps to minimize interference). Currently, a mobile in a plane will be looking for an antenna and will be searching at full strenght.

      Fat Tone: for what it is worth, a mobile does cause interference in small aircraft. First there is the interference in the headset (you hear clicking noises when a mobile is used), and secondly there is the interference with especially the VOR (one of the radio navigation aids). So in that aspect, I think it is normal it was forbidden until they were sure it wasn't going to cause issues on larger aircraft.


      Personally, I'm not sure I like this... Just imagine sitting next to a guy chatting away during the entire flight... Or the noise of the ringtones... (crazy frog anyone? ) Just imagine: 200 passengers (virtually all of them with mobiles), a 2 hour flight and each of them calls once during 2 minutes or gets a call...



      Jörg
      pixar
      Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow. (James Dean)

      Comment


      • #4
        Oh, God, one last haven free from ding-a-ding dong, ding-a-ding-ding-dong and people yakkety-yakking at the tops of their voices gone, when you want to nap after ingesting a plastic meal: GONE

        I shall develop a jammer which will disable mobiles within a 50 m radius.

        The BBC's Grumpy Old Men had it right. Mobile phones in public places are a blight on our civilisation. If this is permitted, the airlines should have a soundproof compartment (standing only) which should be the ONLY place where phones can be used (not may be used; CAN be used).
        Brian (the devil incarnate)

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks for the answer, VJ

          As for the social issue, it can of course be annoying, but it's really no different from a long bus/train ride...I don't find it too annoying in those situations, it's something that can be lived with. They should state some rules like in the movie theater - at least putting the phones in Silent mode and trying not to talk too loudly...anyway, most people I've seen do not like to have a long conversation which would probably also involve some private matters next to at least a dozen people within earshot.
          All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

          Comment


          • #6
            Remind me never to fly TAP Portugal or BMI as from when the service starts or any other airline that introduces it.

            Boycotting airlines that reduce passenger comfort must have an effect.

            I hope the operators price themselves out of business.
            Brian (the devil incarnate)

            Comment


            • #7
              How is this different then the Airphones that are already installed in pretty much every plane in the world? I'm sure the roaming fees are going to be nearly as ridiculous...
              Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox

              Comment


              • #8
                Well, the difference is that the current inflight entertainment system (including the phone) is silent. If you game or so, you need the headset; if you call, the volume is limited.
                However, with mobile phones, people would make more noise (the beeps of the buttons, ringtones if someone gets a call - could be just because he/she forgot to turn it off, games, ...). And chances are they would bother passengers more: imagine you here a ringtone in the overhead bin, people trying to get there in time, standing up, having to pass other passengers, ...

                We can only hope that the roaming charges are high; because using an Airphone is quite a big step for people, esp. compared to using a mobile.


                Jörg
                pixar
                Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die tomorrow. (James Dean)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Brian Ellis
                  I shall develop a jammer which will disable mobiles within a 50 m radius.
                  they already exist. I believe they are used in Japan in certain public locations (theaters, certain restaunts and such).
                  "And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I wonder how expensive they are/how difficult to build...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X