Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Net censorship by tort?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Net censorship by tort?

    Granted this is over very vile posts, but....

    http://www.yaledailynews.com/articles/view/22394

    Law students sue authors of online posts

    Two women face identity hurdle in pursuing users behind ‘sexually explicit’ comments on AutoAdmit


    “Dean_Harold_Koh” — not to be confused with Yale Law School Dean Harold Hongju Koh — and 38 other pseudonymous users of an Internet message board have been sued by two Yale Law School students in connection with defamatory comments on the message board for people in the legal community.

    The two female students first pursued legal action in June against the 39 post authors as well as initial defendant Anthony Ciolli, a former employee of the Web forum AutoAdmit. But the plaintiffs revised their complaint Friday, deciding not to name Ciolli as a defendant.

    Instead, the two students filed suit against the authors of the posts because of what the plaintiffs allege are sexually explicit and derogatory posts made on the site between 2005 and early this year, although it is not clear the plaintiffs’ lawyers know the identities of the 39 defendants. Three female Yale law students were the subjects of the posts, but only two have filed suit.

    AutoAdmit, which calls itself “the most prestigious law school discussion board in the world,” features content — ranging from threads about law school admissions to life at law firms — aimed at those interested in the world of law.
    >
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

  • #2
    Doc, are you implying that pseudonymous forum posts should be exempt from laws/criminal/civil action on libel/defamation?

    If so, I cannot agree with you. I would go so far as to allow the judiciary to force the forum admin to reveal the e-mail addresses and any other useful info about libellers that would help the perps to be identified. For me, the web should be bound by the same rules as printed matter. All the more so as the forum is for law students, who should know better.

    As it happens, 2 days ago I left a forum, with a PM to the Admin giving the reason, because 2 members were getting very close to the limit of libel regarding both other members and public figures (accusations of pimping and other sexual deviations). I do not wish to be involved if such accusations were deemed to be libellous. If it happened on any forum I run (God forbid!!!), I would have no hesitation in helping to bring the perps to justice; OTOH, I would nip it in the bud long before accusations snowballed to such a level. My thought was that the Admin/Moderators of the forum were very lax.
    Brian (the devil incarnate)

    Comment


    • #3
      You're presuming wrongly again. I just dropped the puck.

      These posts obviously cross the line, as I noted in my preamble, but the question is how far should this go? Some people will sue over virtually nothing just to force a settlement & get a few bucks.
      Dr. Mordrid
      ----------------------------
      An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

      I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

      Comment


      • #4
        Well, if you do want to slander your fellow men, there are ways to cover your tracks.
        The Internet is only as anonymous as one is Net-literate.
        Originally posted by Gurm
        .. some very fair skinned women just have a nasty brown crack no matter what...

        Comment

        Working...
        X