Yup...called the reasonable person standard - in this case what would a reasonable person conclude with the same information?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Michael Jackson dead @50
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 29 June 2009, 17:42.Dr. Mordrid
----------------------------
An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.
I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps
-
Sure, but those are legal considerations, not ethical ones.Join MURCs Distributed Computing effort for Rosetta@Home and help fight Alzheimers, Cancer, Mad Cow disease and rising oil prices.
[...]the pervading principle and abiding test of good breeding is the requirement of a substantial and patent waste of time. - Veblen
Comment
-
Originally posted by cjolley View PostIt's perfectly ethical to form a reasonable conclusion.
I'm not suggesting MJ was innocent nor am I suggesting he was guilty. He may even have been a paedophile, which is not criminal as long as he did not have any form of sexual contact with a child, while not being a paederast, which is criminal. This is what his trial suggested and what that kid (the Home Alone one) stated under oath as a witness. This is all we know, the rest is speculation, including the pay-offs (he may have been willing to pay just for a quiet life; remember he was not overly intelligent and he had an equally unintelligent entourage who saw in him the eternal cash cow).
I suggest that all suggestions about him are unethical speculation.Brian (the devil incarnate)
Comment
-
I'm sorta with the devil above me on this one (but that would have been clear).Join MURCs Distributed Computing effort for Rosetta@Home and help fight Alzheimers, Cancer, Mad Cow disease and rising oil prices.
[...]the pervading principle and abiding test of good breeding is the requirement of a substantial and patent waste of time. - Veblen
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brian Ellis View Postreasonable = having reason = (in this case) having definitive proof ...
I would not have let a child of mine, male or female, stay at his house without me present at all times. And I am concerned for the children who did.
I have expressed several reasonable reasons for this.
How does his death change anything?
Except that he is not in a condition to feel offended anymore.Chuck
秋音的爸爸
Comment
-
Perhaps we are referring to different reasonable conclusions. I would, reasonably I believe, conclude that it'd be better not to have my kids at his place.
Some however, reach the reasonable conclusion that it's good MJ has been removed from the gene pool and has lived way to long.Join MURCs Distributed Computing effort for Rosetta@Home and help fight Alzheimers, Cancer, Mad Cow disease and rising oil prices.
[...]the pervading principle and abiding test of good breeding is the requirement of a substantial and patent waste of time. - Veblen
Comment
-
Originally posted by Umfriend View PostSome however, reach the reasonable conclusion that it's good MJ has been removed from the gene pool and has lived way to long.
I wouldn't send him to the gallows myself on the evidence I have, but I'm not going to lose any sleep over his demise.
And if he is completely innocent?
Well, like I said, he's long past caring what I or his fans think of him now.Chuck
秋音的爸爸
Comment
Comment