Originally posted by Wulfman
View Post
Was it a militaristic society? Yes. Does that mean it wasn't a democracy? No. The two are not mutually exclusive.
Nothing stopped people from having a economic life without FS, but if you wanted to participate in the democratic process you had to have earned it. Lots of people find this rather attractive given the Pollyannish attitudes of many in the electorate who make social demands without context based on experience or any participation beyond what they glean from the tube, net or academically.
Heinlein's concept of an all-volunteer high tech strike force lives large in the US military today, and a few years back a USMC General said out loud that future clothing and equipment should emulate much of the Mobile Infantry's. Heinlein got a lot of things right, which is why the systems developed for the Future Force Warrior system have so many of the features he put in the novel.
Comment