United swaps flight manuals/charts for iPads

[UtwigMU]

The switches on ISS are HP Procurve.

Here's a pic of Thinkpads in space. I'd like to have a setup like that. I only have 3 Thinkpads.

[Technoid]

dont they know that electronic consumer devices has magical beams that disrupts flight electronics?

[Dr Mordrid]

Guess not since SpaceShipTwo, at the least, will have wifi

[cjolley]

Here is a pilot's perspective:

http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot/2011/09/01/paperless_cockpit/index.html

The cockpit will never be entirely paperless -- flight plans, weather packets and whatnot are best served the old-fashioned way -- but the more cumbersome hard-copy material, now digitized, will be more quickly and easily accessible.
And quickly and easily revised. The move to electronic manuals is the best idea I've heard in years, if for no other reason than it frees the average pilot from the savagery and tedium of having to update and revise his books. Anybody who flies for a living is -- or was -- familiar with this numbing, biweekly rite of uncompensated labor. In that bag of mine I was lugging around four separate binders of approach, arrival and departure charts covering hundreds of airports around the world; five pounds of en route maps; plus three different company and aircraft manuals. Together these volumes were subject to hundreds of pages of revisions every month. The tiniest addendum, the slightest change to a routing or a tweaked procedure, and bang, 18 pages needed to be swapped out. (Did you know there are 57 pages of arrival and departure profiles just for Madrid, Spain?)
Installing a particularly fat set of revisions could take two hours or more. Common side effects might include dizziness, repetitive motion injuries and suicide.

You were wondering, meanwhile ...
Now that pilots can use their iPads in the cockpit, shouldn't passengers be allowed to use them in the cabin, whenever they want to? And doesn't this prove that the rules about electronic devices aren't really necessary?
Not quite. The main reason tablets and laptops are banned during takeoff and landing isn't because of concerns over interference, but because they might hinder an evacuation, and are potentially dangerous projectiles in the event of an impact or rapid deceleration. I suspect you don't want a Kindle or MacBook knocking you in the head at 180 miles per hour. The devices in the cockpit will need to be stowed or secured as well.
The other big question is about the prospect of these gadgets failing. What happens if the first officer spills a Coke Zero all over his new iPad, or drops it on the floor?
Well, nothing worth worrying about. These are reference materials, not do-or-die sets of instructions. Be wary of the way some in the media have been covering this. Responding to the United Airlines announcement, one headline spoke of pilots "navigating through their iPads." At best that's a caricature.
There always will be at least two devices on board. The important information is already in the plane's FMS database, and anything truly critical will also remain in hard copy. If need be, thanks to some bizarre worst-case scenario, there are other ways of getting this stuff to the pilots -- by radio, ACARS datalink, etc.
Fear not any iPad-related catastrophe.

[Brian Ellis]

Presumably, there must be common access points and pre-shared keys to allow thousands of iPads to be updated simultaneously. This implies there is a high risk of in-flight hacking. If the 2 pilots have different data because of lack of simultaneity, problems could arise. (Runway 12 is closed for maintenance on one and runway 23 on the other, found out on approach, while the tower goes frantic!). You could not rely on the pilots updating manually before each flight.

One way round this problem is to issue an updated iPad to each pilot during pre-flight briefing.

[cjolley]

...
One way round this problem is to issue an updated iPad to each pilot during pre-flight briefing.

Wouldn't this cause them to lose their progress in Angry Birds?