Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Iran's Bushehr the next Chernobyl?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Iran's Bushehr the next Chernobyl?

    Lovely.....

    Link....

    (NewsCore) - The first Iranian nuclear power station is inherently unsafe and will probably cause a "tragic disaster for humankind," according to a document apparently written by an Iranian whistleblower.

    There is a "great likelihood" that the Bushehr reactor could generate the next nuclear catastrophe after Chernobyl or Fukushima, says the document, which has been passed to The (London) Times by a reputable source and is attributed to a former member of the legal department of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran.

    It claims that Bushehr, which began operating last month after 35 years of intermittent construction, was built by "second-class engineers" who bolted together Russian and German technologies from different eras; that it sits in one of the world's most seismically active areas but could not withstand a major earthquake; and that it has "no serious training program" for staff or a contingency plan for accidents.

    The document's authenticity cannot be confirmed, but nuclear experts see no reason to doubt it. It also echoes fears in the nuclear industry about the safety of a secretive project to which few outsiders have been granted access.

    Iran is the only country with a nuclear power plant that has not joined the Convention on Nuclear Safety, which obliges signatories to observe international safety standards and share information.

    Sami Alfaraj, head of the Kuwait Centre for Strategic Studies and an adviser to the Kuwaiti government, says an accident at Bushehr would be a "total calamity for the world," in which nuclear contamination would spew across a wide region.

    He could not assess Bushehr's safety because Iran's cooperation with its neighbors has been "nil," he protested. "They say 'trust us' but there's no such thing as 'trust us' in nuclear politics. They are playing Russian roulette not just with us but with the world."

    Bushehr was started in 1975 when the Shah of Iran awarded the contract to Kraftwerk Union of Germany. When the Germans pulled out after the 1979 Islamic revolution the reactors were far from finished. They sustained serious damage in the Iran-Iraq war of 1980-88. The document claims airstrikes left the steel containment vessel with 1,700 holes, letting in hundreds of tons of rainwater.

    The regime revived the project in the 1990s, but with one reactor only. It wanted a prestige project to show the Islamic Republic could match the scientific achievements of the West.

    It may also have wanted a cover for developing its nuclear weapons program -- and the opportunities for personal enrichment that the project gave Iran's elite. This time Iran employed Russian engineers, who had not built a foreign nuclear reactor since the Soviet Union started to collapse in 1989.

    Russia's experts wanted to start from scratch. The Iranians, having already spent more than $1 billion, insisted they built on the German foundations.

    This involved adapting a structure built for a vertical German reactor to take a horizontal Russian reactor -- an unprecedented operation. Of the 80,000 pieces of German equipment, many had become corroded, obsolete or lacked manuals and paperwork.

    "The Russian parts are designed to standards that are less stringent than the Germans' and they are being used out of context in a design where they are exposed to inappropriate stresses," the document says. It goes on to claim that "much of the necessary work for Bushehr is outside the competence of the Russian consulting engineers," who consider the project a "holiday."
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

  • #2
    Couldn't be worse than Fuk-you-shima right now, since the problem there is ongoing, and run by fu-king idiots who value the almighty 'money' over everything else, including life itself.

    Could be a good reason for 'foreign countries' to invade over some poor arsed excuse of possible nuclear contamination, like their Oil deposits or their choice of religion.

    Has to be a reason right ?

    Get me off this Fu-king planet on a one way mission to anywhere, please.
    PC-1 Fractal Design Arc Mini R2, 3800X, Asus B450M-PRO mATX, 2x8GB B-die@3800C16, AMD Vega64, Seasonic 850W Gold, Black Ice Nemesis/Laing DDC/EKWB 240 Loop (VRM>CPU>GPU), Noctua Fans.
    Nas : i3/itx/2x4GB/8x4TB BTRFS/Raid6 (7 + Hotspare) Xpenology
    +++ : FSP Nano 800VA (Pi's+switch) + 1600VA (PC-1+Nas)

    Comment


    • #3
      Pure rumour, probably written by a disgruntled lawyer with no technical knowledge. IAEA teams have already inspected the site several times.
      Brian (the devil incarnate)

      Comment


      • #4
        2011 -



        Summary

        50. While the Agency continues to conduct verification activities under Iran’s Safeguards Agreement, Iran is not implementing a number of its obligations, including: implementation of the provisions of its Additional Protocol; implementation of the modified Code 3.1 of the Subsidiary Arrangements General Part to its Safeguards Agreement; suspension of enrichment related activities; suspension of heavy water related activities; and addressing the Agency’s concerns about possible military dimensions to Iran’s nuclear programme.

        51. While the Agency continues to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material at the nuclear facilities and LOFs declared by Iran under its Safeguards Agreement, as Iran is not providing the necessary cooperation, including by not implementing its Additional Protocol, the Agency is unable to provide credible assurance about the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities in Iran, and therefore to conclude that all nuclear material in Iran is in peaceful activities.

        52. The Director General will continue to report as appropriate.
        http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/press...prn201003.html

        2010 -

        >
        Recommendations and suggestions to improve INRA´s regulatory effectiveness included the following:

        * The Government should support the prompt enactment of a law establishing INRA as an independent nuclear regulatory authority, as well as provide it with all authority and resources needed to carry out its functions. (read: ineffective in its current form)

        * The Government is encouraged to join the Convention on Nuclear Safety and the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management. (read: not yet)

        * INRA should replace the existing set of ad hoc regulatory requirements with a comprehensive system of national nuclear safety regulations. (read: amateur night)

        * The number and expertise of technical staff should be increased and career incentives should be established to attract and retain them. (read: amateur night)

        The IAEA has conveyed the findings from the current review mission to the Iranian authorities; the final report will be provided to the Government within four months.
        Dr. Mordrid
        ----------------------------
        An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

        I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

        Comment


        • #5
          None of what you quote is relevant to the concerns expressed in The Times article, reprinted as a scaremongering article in the US, because Iran is a pariah state there and anything negative makes for popular journalism. If it were as bad as you pretend, why has the IAEA not brought up these points? Why have the other media ignored it? Even the ultra-anti-environmental Daily Telegraph makes no mention.

          IMHO, this is probably a stupid storm in a teacup promoted by the ignorant.
          Brian (the devil incarnate)

          Comment


          • #6
            Also don't forget possibility of another STUXNET.

            Comment


            • #7
              What, you mean someone other than Iran causing a Nuclear Accident at the Bashir site, and then blaming Iran for it ?
              PC-1 Fractal Design Arc Mini R2, 3800X, Asus B450M-PRO mATX, 2x8GB B-die@3800C16, AMD Vega64, Seasonic 850W Gold, Black Ice Nemesis/Laing DDC/EKWB 240 Loop (VRM>CPU>GPU), Noctua Fans.
              Nas : i3/itx/2x4GB/8x4TB BTRFS/Raid6 (7 + Hotspare) Xpenology
              +++ : FSP Nano 800VA (Pi's+switch) + 1600VA (PC-1+Nas)

              Comment


              • #8
                Not outwith the bounds of possibility, with state-sanctioned action.
                Brian (the devil incarnate)

                Comment

                Working...
                X