A frightening bit of Phobos-Grunt history by Russian space historian Anatoly Zak of RussianSpaceWeb.com. Truly scary.
Update: 2 pieces have broken off and some observers think it's tumbling.
Update: 2 pieces have broken off and some observers think it's tumbling.
>
The fueling of the probe's cruise stage with pressurized gas and propellant components was completed sometimes before October 27 and the Chinese YH-1 micro-satellite was also fueled around the same time. The fueling of the Earth return vehicle was scheduled for October 27 and was confirmed as completed on November 1. In the meantime, the MDU propulsion unit was integrated with the transfer section, which served as an interface between the spacecraft and the second stage of the Zenit-2SB rocket.
Final tests uncover serious problems
On November 1, inside the MIK-31-40 assembly building, joint industrial teams had conducted tests of opening of the probe's solar panels, Roskosmos said, without much details. However only after the launch of the ill-fated mission, not unexpected stories started surfacing about numerous problems which had been uncovered during final tests in Baikonur.
As it transpired, engineers found that the polarity for the steering control of the main engine had been mistakenly switched over in the flight control software of the main BKU computer. Nobody knew how such a major problem could've been missed during supposedly thorough certification tests in Moscow. Initially, managers decided to limit corrective actions to re-soldering of respective cables. As a result, six cables had to be reconnected on a spacecraft fully loaded with toxic and explosive propellants. Similar attempts to do electric repairs on the fueled vehicle led to the mass loss of life in Baikonur in the aftermath of the infamous Nedelin disaster in 1960.
However, after these repairs, it had become clear that all control signals from multiple cables had been channeled to the same driving mechanism. This mistake could not be fixed by re-routing cables, instead requiring complex changes in the flight control software. Last updates to the programming software had to be added right at the launch site, leaving no time for a new round of tests. The incident was reported to the head of the Russian space agency, Vladimir Popovkin. (534)
>
The fueling of the probe's cruise stage with pressurized gas and propellant components was completed sometimes before October 27 and the Chinese YH-1 micro-satellite was also fueled around the same time. The fueling of the Earth return vehicle was scheduled for October 27 and was confirmed as completed on November 1. In the meantime, the MDU propulsion unit was integrated with the transfer section, which served as an interface between the spacecraft and the second stage of the Zenit-2SB rocket.
Final tests uncover serious problems
On November 1, inside the MIK-31-40 assembly building, joint industrial teams had conducted tests of opening of the probe's solar panels, Roskosmos said, without much details. However only after the launch of the ill-fated mission, not unexpected stories started surfacing about numerous problems which had been uncovered during final tests in Baikonur.
As it transpired, engineers found that the polarity for the steering control of the main engine had been mistakenly switched over in the flight control software of the main BKU computer. Nobody knew how such a major problem could've been missed during supposedly thorough certification tests in Moscow. Initially, managers decided to limit corrective actions to re-soldering of respective cables. As a result, six cables had to be reconnected on a spacecraft fully loaded with toxic and explosive propellants. Similar attempts to do electric repairs on the fueled vehicle led to the mass loss of life in Baikonur in the aftermath of the infamous Nedelin disaster in 1960.
However, after these repairs, it had become clear that all control signals from multiple cables had been channeled to the same driving mechanism. This mistake could not be fixed by re-routing cables, instead requiring complex changes in the flight control software. Last updates to the programming software had to be added right at the launch site, leaving no time for a new round of tests. The incident was reported to the head of the Russian space agency, Vladimir Popovkin. (534)
>
Comment